Skip to main content

Rabeprazole

proton pump inhibitor (A02BC)

Also sold as Aciphex.

Findings for this medication

Research about this medication, graded for how strongly each finding can be attributed to it. Nothing here describes your own levels.

Rabeprazole has no classical depletion machinery of the enzyme-induction, renal-wasting or cofactor-antagonist type. A significant portion is cleared by systemic nonenzymatic reduction to a thioether, with CYP3A (sulphone) and CYP2C19 (desmethyl) as secondary routes; about 90% of a radiolabeled dose was recovered in urine as metabolites; and the label describes no clinically significant interactions with CYP substrates such as theophylline, diazepam or phenytoin [1]. Its route to altered nutrient status is the intended pharmacology acting indirectly: raising intragastric pH changes the acid-dependent absorption of some nutrients and the gut ecosystem. That acid suppression is not graded as a deficiency (Hard Rule 2). Rabeprazole's distinct pharmacokinetics (largely nonenzymatic clearance, fast acid activation) change how the drug is cleared and how quickly it acts; none of the sources opened shows that they change nutrient outcomes (see the pharmacokinetic basis).

proton pump inhibitor (A02BC) · ATC A02BC04 [3] · also sold as Aciphex [1][2] · reviewed 2026-10-04. This describes research about the medication. It does not say anything about your own levels or health.

How to read the evidence grades

These colours describe how strongly a finding can be attributed to the medication in the research. They are not a severity score and they say nothing about your own health.

Grades describe how strongly a finding can be attributed to Rabeprazole in the research — not how common it is, how serious it would be, and not anything about you personally.

Red — Severe
Two or more independent Tier A sources, this drug in the cohort, the nutrient directly measured, consistent direction, clinically meaningful magnitude, a named mechanism, no substantial contradicting Tier A evidence.
Orange — Moderate
At least one Tier A source with this drug in the cohort showing a real but bounded deficit: an exposure window, a subgroup, low frequency, or a functional rather than circulating deficit.
Yellow — Low
Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction.
Not graded — disclosed evidence gap
Nothing has been measured here, so this finding cannot be graded. That does not establish either safety or harm, and it is not the same as a White result.Source definition: Not gradeable under the rules above because nothing has been measured. Published as a documented gap, never as reassurance that there is no effect.

What the research found

Magnesium: lower serum magnesium with prolonged exposure, mainly older adults and diuretic users; rabeprazole-specific effect size not isolated

Orange — Moderate

Evidence: moderate

Prolonged PPI exposure, rabeprazole included (label: at least three months, most cases after a year), can lower serum magnesium in a minority of patients; the reported rabeprazole case resolved after the drug was stopped.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: At least one Tier A source with this drug in the cohort showing a real but bounded deficit: an exposure window, a subgroup, low frequency, or a functional rather than circulating deficit. Orange - moderate

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Meta-analysis hospitalized subgroup (5 studies): OR 1.342 (0.895-2.011), not significant, I2 92.0% [5]. Ontario non-diuretic users: not significant [4]. In the five-PPI cross-sectional study, rabeprazole had the lowest hypomagnesemia rates [7]. No rabeprazole-specific null study was located.
  • At-risk subgroups: Adults aged 66 or older, diuretic users, digoxin users, prolonged duration (label and [4]).

Regulatory status

Eisai label section 5.8: hypomagnesemia, symptomatic and asymptomatic, reported rarely in patients treated with PPIs for at least three months, in most cases after a year of therapy; for patients expected to be on prolonged treatment or to take digoxin or diuretics, clinicians may consider monitoring magnesium before starting and periodically. Waylis label (10/2025) section 5.9: hypomagnesemia may lead to hypocalcemia and/or hypokalemia and may exacerbate underlying hypocalcemia in at-risk patients [1][2]. The statements are written at PPI-class level.

Population evidence

Rabeprazole in the cohort, pooled: Ontario population case-control, age 66 or older, 366 hospitalized hypomagnesemia cases vs 1,464 controls; omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole analyzed as one exposure: current use adjusted OR 1.43 (95% CI 1.06-1.93); diuretic users 1.73 (1.11-2.70); non-diuretic users 1.25 (0.81-1.91); no per-PPI estimates [4]. Rabeprazole case (Tier B): 64-year-old man on rabeprazole 10 mg/day for 5 years, severe hypomagnesemia with convulsions; improved after rabeprazole was stopped and electrolytes corrected, without recurrence (no rechallenge) [6]. Rabeprazole in the cohort, no non-PPI comparator: 305 adults on a PPI for 1 year or longer; hypomagnesemia in 65 (21.3%); omeprazole users had significantly lower magnesium than users of pantoprazole, rabeprazole, esomeprazole and lansoprazole; the abstract states rabeprazole users had the lowest rates; rabeprazole user numbers not given [7]. Tier C class: meta-analysis, 9 observational studies, 115,455 patients, adjusted OR 1.484 (1.103-1.997); rabeprazole appears only as a search keyword and individual PPIs are not identified in the results [5].

Mechanism

Reduced intestinal magnesium absorption is the proposed class mechanism; it is not demonstrated for rabeprazole. Renal wasting (mechanism C) is not shown in any source opened.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record Absolute risk is small (the Ontario authors estimate 76,591 patients treated for 90 days per excess hospitalization) and that study had no serum magnesium values and unverified coding validity [4]. Pooled estimates are class-level with very high heterogeneity [5]. The rabeprazole case had electrolyte correction applied together with withdrawal and no rechallenge [6]. The cross-sectional study has no non-PPI control and no rabeprazole count [7]. Confounding by diuretics, age and comorbidity is not excluded. Not red: no rabeprazole-stratified measurement against a comparator. Framing caution A rare laboratory finding tied to long exposure, not a prompt to start magnesium on one's own; the label ties management to clinician-directed monitoring. This is a lowered-level finding, so the hazard of self-supplementing without a measured result is real. No dose is given or implied.

Vitamin B12: label class warning and class-level association; no rabeprazole-specific measurement located

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

Long-term acid suppression is associated with lower B12 status at class level; no study that measured B12 in rabeprazole users was located.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Randomized comparisons against anti-reflux surgery (esomeprazole 5 years, n=514; omeprazole 12 years, n=298): vitamin B12, folate and vitamin D showed no clinically relevant changes over time; rabeprazole not in either cohort [15]. In [14] most studies found no serum B12 difference between users and non-users.
  • At-risk subgroups: Exposure beyond about 3 years per the label; no rabeprazole-specific subgroup analysis found.

Regulatory status

Eisai label 5.7 (Waylis 5.8): daily treatment with any acid-suppressing medication over a long period (for example longer than 3 years) may lead to malabsorption of cyanocobalamin [1][2]. The wording is class-wide and names no rabeprazole-specific measurement.

Population evidence

Tier C class extrapolation: Kaiser Permanente case-control, 25,956 B12-deficiency cases and 184,199 controls: PPI use of 2 or more years adjusted OR 1.65 (1.58-1.73); high dose 1.95 (1.77-2.15); lower dose 1.63 (1.48-1.78). The page opened names no individual PPI, so rabeprazole in the cohort could not be confirmed [13]. Meta-analysis, 25 studies, 2,852 PPI users vs 28,070 non-users: OR 1.42 (1.16-1.73), I2 54%; most studies found no serum B12 difference; no per-PPI stratification in the abstract [14]. A 7-day study of 60 volunteers across five PPIs including rabeprazole is in the PubMed B12 listing but did not report B12 measurements [33].

Mechanism

Hypochlorhydria impairing cobalamin absorption, as stated in the label [1]. Mechanism A present at class level.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record Both class sources pool PPIs and could not be confirmed to include rabeprazole [13][14]; confounding by indication, age and diet is not excluded. Neuropathy or anemia without a measured B12 is an outcome, not a B12 finding (Hard Rule 2). Framing caution A monitoring prompt for long-term users, not a statement that rabeprazole depletes B12. No supplement or dose is recommended in this dossier.

Calcium: lower serum calcium with higher PTH in one rabeprazole mouse study; no rabeprazole human data; fracture is an outcome

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

In one 18-week mouse study rabeprazole lowered serum calcium and raised PTH; a gastrectomy rat model went the other way for bone density; human rabeprazole data were not located.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Class absorption data are inconsistent and food-dependent [12][19][40]. No rabeprazole human calcium measurement located. The gastrectomy rat model showed no bone loss attributable to rabeprazole [18].
  • At-risk subgroups: Patients with pre-existing hypocalcemia risk; the label ties low calcium to low magnesium [2].

Regulatory status

Waylis label 5.9: hypomagnesemia may lead to hypocalcemia [2]. Label section 5.5 (Eisai): PPI therapy may be associated with osteoporosis-related fractures of hip, wrist or spine, with higher risk at high dose (multiple daily doses) and long-term use (a year or longer) [1]. Fracture is an outcome and is not filed as calcium deficiency (Hard Rule 2).

Evidence (Tier B, rabeprazole)

Female Swiss albino mice, rabeprazole 10 mg/kg every 48 hours for 18 weeks (80 mice, four groups): serum calcium 5.5 +/- 2.07 vs 9.68 +/- 2.77 in vehicle (units printed as U/L in the page text; P<0.05); PTH 43.98 +/- 19.23 vs 18.69 +/- 4.19 pg/mL (P<0.05); lower bone mineral density (P<0.05); calcium supplementation or alendronate restored density [17]. Opposite direction: total-gastrectomy rats, 22 weeks, rabeprazole significantly ameliorated the gastrectomy-induced BMD decrease but did not improve bone strength [18]. Tier C class: a narrative review reports omeprazole decreased calcium carbonate absorption by 41% in postmenopausal women in the fasting state (primary study not opened) [12]; another review states results on PPIs and calcium absorption are inconsistent and cites a short-term omeprazole study that found no inhibition of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium or zinc absorption from food [19]. A prospective trial in 21 postmenopausal women (omeprazole 40 mg/day for 30 days; rabeprazole not included) found fractional calcium absorption did not change significantly (p=0.07) [40].

Mechanism

The mouse-study authors propose reduced calcium absorption from hypochlorhydria and direct inhibition of osteoclast H+/K+-ATPase [17]. A companion marker moved in the expected direction in that study (PTH rose with lower calcium), but it is a mouse study.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record The mouse authors did not measure gastric acid, could not rule out that the co-administered calcium carbonate affected the drug, and call for human trials [17]. Doses are not scaled to human exposure. Fracture risk and low bone density are outcomes with competing explanations (age, comorbidity) and are not calcium or vitamin D deficiency. Framing caution No rabeprazole-specific calcium deficit is shown in people. Do not infer a need for calcium supplementation from this entry; no dose is recommended.

Zinc: lower plasma zinc in a small mixed-PPI study that included rabeprazole users; rabeprazole-specific zinc-protein chemistry in vitro

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

A small experimental study found lower baseline plasma zinc and a blunted response to a zinc test dose in chronic PPI users, rabeprazole users a minority; laboratory work shows rabeprazole reacts with zinc-bound cysteines, which is a chemistry finding, not a zinc-status finding.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Opposite direction in a class cohort without rabeprazole: zinc 0.95 vs 0.83 mg/L, higher in PPI users, p=0.01 [11]. Pantoprazole-only study: zinc 81.2 vs 87.0 ug/dL, p=0.08 [16]. A narrative review notes serum zinc lower on PPI therapy in cited data but not copper [12].
  • At-risk subgroups: None established.

Regulatory status

Not named in the label text returned [1].

Population evidence

Three-part experimental study with rabeprazole (Aciphex) users in two parts, none analyzed separately. Study 3: 10 controls vs 10 chronic PPI users (Prilosec 4, Protonix 3, Aciphex 2, Nexium 1), single blood draw: baseline plasma zinc 91 +/- 3 vs 75 +/- 3 mcg/dL (P=0.004, 18% lower); red-blood-cell zinc not different. Study 2: 5 controls vs 6 PPI users (Prilosec 2, Nexium 1, Aciphex 1, one unspecified), one user dropped out; after 14 days of zinc supplementation plasma zinc rose 126 +/- 12% in controls vs 37 +/- 7% in PPI users [8]. Tier A for rabeprazole only in the sense that rabeprazole users were part of a mixed group (2 of 10; 1 of 6).

Mechanism

Zinc is readily absorbed at low pH but not as easily at elevated pH, per the study authors [8] (mechanism A, proposed). Separately, in vitro chemoproteomics showed rabeprazole forms covalent conjugates with zinc-binding proteins; in the C4 zinc cluster of DENR, zinc acts as a Lewis acid that activates rabeprazole in non-acidic conditions [9] (Tier B). That work did not measure zinc status, loss or excretion.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record Tiny samples (10 PPI users in one part, 6 in another), mixed PPIs with rabeprazole a minority, conflicting direction across studies, and plasma zinc responds to many non-drug factors. The chemistry paper shows target engagement in a laboratory system and does not show a clinical effect. Framing caution Conflicting data do not support a zinc deficiency claim. The study's supplementation protocol is deliberately not restated and is not a recommendation; no zinc dose is advised.

Vitamin C: second-hand omeprazole datum in a narrative review; no rabeprazole data

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

A review cites a fall in ascorbic acid after omeprazole treatment; no rabeprazole ascorbic acid measurement was located.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: None measured for rabeprazole.
  • At-risk subgroups: None identified.

Regulatory status

Not named in the label text returned [1].

Population evidence

Tier C class extrapolation (narrative review, omeprazole data): omeprazole 40 mg daily reduced ascorbic acid from 3.8 to 0.7 mcg/mL (P<0.0001) after 4 weeks; the primary study was not opened and rabeprazole was not in the cohort [12]. The one rabeprazole PubMed hit for ascorbic acid used it only as the reference standard in a scavenging assay [25].

Mechanism

The review links PPIs to reduced ascorbic acid stability at higher gastric pH, in the context of non-heme iron absorption [12]. Proposed, class level.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record No consumer page sampled made a vitamin C claim for rabeprazole. The only supporting datum is a second-hand citation of an omeprazole study, which cannot support a rabeprazole claim above yellow. Framing caution Class-level, second-hand evidence. No vitamin C dose is recommended.

Vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D): large difference in one small pantoprazole-only study, null in an esomeprazole/omeprazole trial; rabeprazole absent from both

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

Class data conflict: one small pantoprazole-only study found markedly lower vitamin D, while long-term randomized esomeprazole and omeprazole cohorts showed no clinically relevant change; no rabeprazole vitamin D study was located.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: LOTUS and SOPRAN randomized cohorts (esomeprazole 5 years, omeprazole 12 years, surgical comparator): vitamin D showed no clinically relevant changes over time [15]. A narrative review on PPIs and bone did not discuss vitamin D levels in PPI users [19]. A PubMed listing for rabeprazole with vitamin D or folate terms returned no relevant study.
  • At-risk subgroups: Older adults (age imbalance in [16]).

Regulatory status

No vitamin D statement in the label text returned [1].

Population evidence

Tier C class extrapolation (rabeprazole not in the cohort): case-control, pantoprazole 40 mg/day for more than 12 months (n=30) vs non-users (n=36): vitamin D 15.5 +/- 6.8 vs 36.6 +/- 21.2 ng/mL, p<0.001; deficiency 100% vs 25% (control figure as returned by the fetch tool); the pantoprazole group averaged 75.6 vs 63.2 years [16].

Mechanism

None named in the sources opened. Mechanism absent.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record The pantoprazole-only study authors list small sample size, no baseline values, no dietary or BMI data and unassessed interfering drugs [16]; the randomized cohorts had a surgical comparator and reported no change [15]. Low bone density or fracture is not vitamin D deficiency (Hard Rule 2). No circulating consumer claim for rabeprazole and vitamin D was found. Framing caution Single unreplicated class observation; not a claim that rabeprazole lowers vitamin D. No vitamin D dose is recommended.

The five body-system areas

Each finding is counted once, in a single area. Where a study is mentioned in a second area it is context only.

Mitochondrial Burden

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Mitochondrial burden: class-level rat data for omeprazole, esomeprazole and lansoprazole; rabeprazole not in the cohort

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

No study of rabeprazole's effect on mitochondrial structure or function was located; class data for other PPIs show impaired mitophagy in a rat kidney-disease model.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: PubMed listings for rabeprazole with mitochondria or mitochondrial returned a single unrelated item (a parasite glycolytic enzyme [32]); no rabeprazole mitochondrial-function study was found.
  • At-risk subgroups: None identified.

Regulatory status

Not addressed. The label mechanism is covalent inhibition of the gastric (H+, K+)-ATPase, a proton pump distinct from mitochondrial machinery; that intended effect is not graded here (Hard Rule 2) [1].

Evidence (Tier C, class)

Sprague-Dawley rats with chronic kidney disease given omeprazole, esomeprazole or lansoprazole (rabeprazole not mentioned in the record): PPIs inhibited COX-2-mediated mitophagy through the PINK1/Parkin pathway in vascular smooth muscle and accelerated vascular calcification [27]. Rabeprazole was in the PPI set of the lysosome and ER-stress study [26], but its abstract addresses lysosomal and ER compartments and not mitochondria.

Mechanism

Impaired selective autophagy of mitochondria (mechanism E) in class-level animal data [27]; no rabeprazole mechanism located.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record Abstract-level reading through OpenAlex; a CKD rat model with a vascular-calcification outcome does not predict mitochondrial effects in people taking rabeprazole, and the drug is not named in the record. Held at yellow only because the class-extrapolation rule is met (a class member has real supporting data). Framing caution No mitochondrial-support supplement is recommended. Shares evidence with Oxidative stress; see Overlap map.

Oxidative Stress

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Oxidative stress: mixed direction in animal, cell and chemistry data; no human redox-marker data

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

Rabeprazole lowered lipid peroxidation and raised antioxidant enzymes in a rat colitis model, scavenged radicals only weakly in a chemical assay, and was among PPIs that triggered ER stress responses in cells; no human data.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: No human study measuring oxidative stress markers in rabeprazole users was located. The scavenging assay shows rabeprazole is the weakest of five PPIs tested [25].
  • At-risk subgroups: None identified.

Regulatory status

Not addressed in the label text returned [1].

Evidence (Tier B, rabeprazole)

Male Wistar rats with acetic-acid colonic injury, rabeprazole 20 mg/kg/day for 10 days: malondialdehyde decreased, superoxide dismutase activity and glutathione increased, histology and inflammatory markers attenuated [24]. DPPH radical-scavenging assay: omeprazole and esomeprazole scavenged most (IC50 18.7 +/- 5.7 and 5.7 micromolar); rabeprazole showed minimal activity (IC50 49.3 +/- 3.1, 49 +/- 9.4 and 40.7 +/- 7.2 micromolar across measurements) [25]. Cell and organelle work including rabeprazole: PPIs at 20 micromolar suppressed about 70% of V-ATPase function in isolated lysosomes, caused TFEB nuclear translocation, ER stress through PERK, IRE1 and ATF6, and increased SOD activity; results reported for the PPIs together (esomeprazole, pantoprazole, dexlansoprazole, rabeprazole) [26].

Mechanism

Weak direct radical scavenging by rabeprazole [25]; indirect antioxidant-enzyme effects in an injury model [24]; lysosomal and ER stress with a compensatory SOD rise in cells [26]. Human relevance unproven.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record The same drug looks protective in an injury model and stress-inducing in cells, and weakly antioxidant in chemistry, so no single direction can be attributed. [26] reports class-level results, and its 20 micromolar exposure was not compared with clinical plasma levels in the abstract. Doses in rats are not human-equivalent. Framing caution Mechanistic only; neither an antioxidant-depletion claim nor a benefit claim. No antioxidant supplement is recommended.

Copper and Iron Balance

Copper and iron are assessed separately. Nothing here is counted twice.

Iron: pH-dependent absorption is plausible; one rabeprazole case of iron-deficiency anemia unresponsive to oral iron; no controlled rabeprazole data

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

Reduced gastric acidity can lower non-heme iron absorption; for rabeprazole the evidence is a single case report plus a class cohort that excluded rabeprazole.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: No rabeprazole-specific null study was located. Class context: a pantoprazole-only study found serum iron 85.9 vs 83.4 ug/dL, p=0.71 [16].
  • At-risk subgroups: Patients taking oral iron salts (label interaction); no rabeprazole-specific subgroup.

Regulatory status

Label section 7 lists iron salts among drugs whose absorption depends on gastric pH [1]. The label text returned lists no iron-deficiency adverse reaction; postmarketing hemolytic anemia is addressed under Oxygen delivery/utilization.

Evidence (Tier B, rabeprazole)

Case report: 59-year-old man treated with rabeprazole for GERD gradually developed iron-deficiency anemia; ferrous fumarate did not resolve it; endoscopy of the whole GI tract including the small intestine found no cause; after a switch from rabeprazole to famotidine the anemia was cured within three months [10]. Tier C class: pilot cross-sectional study, 37 PPI users (3 to 10 years; pantoprazole 18, esomeprazole 9, omeprazole 7, dexlansoprazole 2, lansoprazole 1; rabeprazole not included) vs 30 healthy controls: serum iron 16.3 vs 23.4 umol/L and hemoglobin 12.5 vs 14.3 g/dL, both p<0.001; ferritin not measured [11]. A narrative review cites the same rabeprazole case [12].

Mechanism

Acid-dependent solubility and absorption of non-heme iron (mechanism A), consistent with the label's pH-dependent absorption list [1]. Reversal on a switch to an H2 blocker in the case fits a drug-related absorption effect but is a single observation.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record One case, no rechallenge, no iron indices in the abstract text retrieved [10]. The class cohort used healthy controls 18 years younger on average (57.1 vs 39.3 years) and mixed PPIs without rabeprazole [11]. Anemia and low hemoglobin are outcomes, not iron deficiency, unless iron indices are measured (Hard Rule 2). Framing caution Not a statement that rabeprazole causes iron deficiency in typical users. Unneeded iron supplementation would be the hazard for people without a confirmed deficit. No dose is recommended.

Copper: higher, not lower, in a class cohort that excluded rabeprazole

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

The only copper measurement located is a mixed-PPI cohort without rabeprazole, in which serum copper was higher in PPI users; there are no rabeprazole copper data.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: A narrative review states the lower serum zinc on PPI therapy was not observed for copper [12]. In the zinc experiment, serum copper changed little with zinc supplementation in controls; no PPI-versus-control copper comparison was reported [8]. A PubMed listing combining rabeprazole with copper, zinc and vitamin D terms returned no rabeprazole copper study.
  • At-risk subgroups: None identified.

Regulatory status

No copper statement in the label text returned [1].

Population evidence

Tier C class extrapolation (rabeprazole not in the cohort): pilot cross-sectional study, 37 PPI users for 3 to 10 years (pantoprazole 18, esomeprazole 9, omeprazole 7, dexlansoprazole 2, lansoprazole 1) vs 30 healthy controls: copper 1.14 +/- 0.25 vs 0.97 +/- 0.22 mg/L, p<0.001, higher in PPI users [11].

Mechanism

None named. Acid-dependent copper absorption is not established in any source opened.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record One small cross-sectional pilot with healthy controls 18 years younger on average, mixed PPIs and no replication; a single comparison cannot show that the drug caused the difference. Copper is kept independent of Iron and Zinc although [11] supplies all three values (see Overlap map). Framing caution A reverse-direction, unreplicated observation in a cohort without rabeprazole. Copper supplementation would be the hazard, not the remedy; none is recommended.

Gut Microbiome Risk

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Gut microbiome risk: composition shifts in human studies that included rabeprazole, and dysbiosis in two rabeprazole mouse studies

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

PPIs, rabeprazole among them, alter gut microbiome composition; a rabeprazole-specific effect size in people is not available.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Total fecal organic acid concentration and blood bacteria detection did not change in [21].
  • At-risk subgroups: Not defined for rabeprazole; the mouse data are in stress and NSAID-injury contexts [22][23].

Regulatory status

Not addressed as a microbiome effect in the label text returned [1].

Population evidence

Rabeprazole in the cohort, not stratified: 20 reflux-esophagitis patients received 8 weeks of esomeprazole 20 mg, rabeprazole 10 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg daily; stool Lactobacillus species rose at 4 and 8 weeks (P=0.011, P=0.002) and Streptococcus species rose (P<0.01, P<0.001); total organic acids unchanged; bacteria detected in blood 22% before and 28% after (not significant); per-PPI numbers not reported and esomeprazole was predominantly prescribed [21]. Rabeprazole listed among six PPIs: three Dutch cohorts, 1,815 participants, 211 PPI users (11.6%): lower Shannon diversity and richness, about 20% of taxa changed, oral bacteria (Rothia) and Escherichia coli increased; per-PPI counts not reported [20]. Tier B, rabeprazole: C57BL/6J mice under water-avoidance stress given rabeprazole 40 mg/kg had higher intestinal permeability and altered fecal microbiota, and transfer of that microbiota reproduced the permeability change [22]; in mice given indomethacin, rabeprazole increased operational taxonomic units and, like vonoprazan, reduced Lactobacillus johnsonii; transplanting treated-mouse contents increased injury and L. johnsonii supplementation prevented it [23].

Mechanism

Raised gastric pH allowing oral and upper-tract organisms to reach the lower gut and reduced acid-sensitive taxa (mechanism G, proposed in [20][23]); consequences for endogenous nutrient synthesis were not measured.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record [21] is a single-arm 20-patient pre-post study with three PPIs and no rabeprazole count; [20] is cross-sectional with confounding by indication (its cohorts included IBD and IBS patients). The two mouse studies come from overlapping author groups and used doses that are not human-equivalent [22][23]. The human microbiome result cannot be separated by drug. Framing caution A composition finding, not a nutrient deficiency and not a statement of health harm from rabeprazole specifically. No probiotic is recommended here.

Oxygen and ATP Output

Oxygen delivery and ATP production are assessed separately. Nothing here is counted twice.

Oxygen delivery/utilization: one rabeprazole methemoglobinemia case with recurrence on rechallenge; postmarketing hemolytic anemia; iron-route anemia is an outcome

Yellow — Low

Evidence: low

A single case report links rabeprazole to methemoglobinemia (reduced oxygen delivery through hemoglobin oxidation) and the label lists hemolytic anemia as a postmarketing reaction; no arterial oxygenation or tissue oxygen data exist for rabeprazole.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow - low

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: No hemoglobin, hematocrit, arterial oxygenation or tissue oxygen data were located in any rabeprazole cohort.
  • At-risk subgroups: Not defined.

Regulatory status

Eisai label section 6.2, postmarketing blood and lymphatic disorders: agranulocytosis, hemolytic anemia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, thrombocytopenia [1]. These are idiosyncratic adverse reactions; frequency is not stated in the text returned.

Evidence (Tier B, rabeprazole)

Case report: 82-year-old woman developed progressive cyanosis with elevated methemoglobin during rabeprazole therapy; levels fell after discontinuation and rose on reintroduction; other medications and congenital causes were excluded; the authors state causality cannot be established from a single case and note no prior PPI cases were documented [28]. Iron route: one rabeprazole case of iron-deficiency anemia [10] (see Iron). Tier C class: hemoglobin 12.5 vs 14.3 g/dL in a PPI cohort that excluded rabeprazole [11].

Mechanism

For methemoglobinemia, hemoglobin oxidation, as framed by the case authors; how rabeprazole would cause it is not established [28]. For anemia through iron, see Iron. Mechanism otherwise absent.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record A single suspected-causality case read as an abstract through OpenAlex and a summarizing tool; the methemoglobin percentages were not captured [28]. Anemia and low hemoglobin are outcomes, not nutrient deficiencies (Hard Rule 2). Kept independent from ATP production (Hard Rule 7); it shares the iron case and the class cohort with the Iron entry (see Overlap map). Framing caution Not a claim that rabeprazole impairs oxygen delivery in typical users. No iron or antioxidant supplement is recommended, and no dose is given.

ATP production

Not graded — disclosed evidence gap

Evidence: evidence gap

No study measuring cellular ATP output or oxidative phosphorylation in rabeprazole-exposed human tissue, and no circulating claim about it, was located.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Nothing has been measured here, so this finding cannot be graded. That does not establish either safety or harm, and it is not the same as a White result. Ungraded - evidence gap

Limits on what this shows

  • Why no grade: The dual condition in Step 7 is met. (1) No Tier B or Tier C evidence supports even a yellow grade: the only PubMed item returned for rabeprazole with ATP, energy metabolism or oxidative phosphorylation terms describes inactivation of a glycolytic enzyme (triosephosphate isomerase) of a parasitic microsporidium in vitro and tested no human enzyme or cell [32]; the class mitochondrial datum [27] concerns mitophagy in vascular smooth muscle, is graded under Mitochondrial burden and does not measure ATP. (2) None of the six consumer or reference pages opened made an energy, fatigue-as-ATP or mitochondrial claim about rabeprazole; fatigue and weakness appear only as symptoms of low magnesium on a side-effect page [35], which is covered by the Magnesium entry. This is a disclosed gap, not a finding of safety.

Channels tried and outcome

PubMed HTML listing pages through the fetch tool (worked): "rabeprazole ATP OR energy metabolism OR oxidative phosphorylation" returned one unrelated parasite-enzyme item [32]; "rabeprazole mitochondria OR mitochondrial" returned the same single item; "proton pump inhibitor mitochondrial dysfunction" returned 14 results, none measuring ATP in rabeprazole-exposed tissue (two PPI-specific hits were read at abstract level: one names omeprazole, esomeprazole and lansoprazole [27], the other esomeprazole). DailyMed labels (worked via fetch tool): read for relevant sections; no energy or ATP effect described [1][2]. OpenAlex single-record lookups (worked, used for abstracts); OpenAlex and Crossref search endpoints returned 429. Web search: budget exhausted (200 of 200) before any ATP-specific query could be run. Europe PMC and Semantic Scholar were not tried in this review (direct access is blocked by organization policy and the fetch tool was spent on PubMed, OpenAlex and publisher pages).

Gap type

Genuine absence on the PubMed channel across three phrasings, but search breadth was limited by tooling: web search, OpenAlex search, Crossref search, Europe PMC and Semantic Scholar were unavailable or untried. A later revision should re-check this category with those channels.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence on record Not applicable; no data to counter. Kept independent from Oxygen delivery/utilization and Mitochondrial burden as required. Framing caution Do not read this entry as reassurance. It states only that no evidence was found in the channels that could be searched.

Claims checked and not supported

These circulate online for this medication. They are listed here only so they can be answered, never as findings, and they are not graded.

A claim with no supporting evidence is not necessarily disproven. Where evidence actually argues against a claim, that is stated below.

  • None met the white standard

    Where it comes from: Circulating-claim audit of six consumer or reference pages [34][35][36][37][38][39], one of which is a label reprint [37]

    Why it fails: Every nutrient claim found traces to the label's class-wide B12, magnesium, fracture or pH-dependent interaction statements, or to a rabeprazole case report, and each has at least Tier C support, so each is graded yellow or orange rather than white (see the audit below). The seven physiological categories were not claimed on any page opened.

How the body handles this medication

Metabolism and enzyme effects
"A significant portion" is metabolized by systemic nonenzymatic reduction to a thioether. Also metabolized in liver to a sulphone (mainly CYP3A) and a desmethyl compound (CYP2C19). CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (3 to 5% of Caucasians, 17 to 20% of Asians) metabolize rabeprazole slowly. No clinically significant interactions with theophylline (CYP1A2), diazepam (CYP2C9/3A4) or phenytoin (CYP2C9/2C19); no CYP induction statement was found in the label text returned. Mechanism B (enzyme-induction catabolism) absent.[1] label 7, 12.3 (read via summarizing fetch tool); [2]
Elimination and organ impairment
About 90% of the dose recovered in urine, mainly as thioether carboxylic acid, its glucuronide and mercapturic acid metabolites; the remainder in feces; total recovery 99.8%. Plasma half-life about 1 to 2 hours, while pharmacodynamic effect outlasts it. Hepatic impairment (single dose): AUC about doubled, half-life 2- to 3-fold longer. End-stage renal disease: no clinically significant pharmacokinetic differences.[1] label 12.2, 12.3; [2] label 12.3
Absorption, food and antacids
Tmax 2 to 5 hours; absolute bioavailability of a 20 mg tablet about 52%; 96.3% plasma protein bound. High-fat meal: Tmax variable, Cmax and AUC not significantly altered. Antacids: no clinically relevant change in plasma rabeprazole. The label text returned names no absorption transporter.[1] label 12.3
Renal tubular handling and mineral interactions
No effect on renal tubular handling of water or electrolytes is described in the label text returned (mechanism C not established). Label lists hypomagnesemia with a note that it may lead to hypocalcemia and/or hypokalemia. Reduced gastric acidity can lower absorption of drugs that depend on gastric pH, naming iron salts, erlotinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, mycophenolate mofetil, ketoconazole and itraconazole. Digoxin: Cmax about 29% and AUC about 19% higher.[1] label 5.8, 7; [2] label 5.9
Activation chemistry and pH stability
Stability is a function of pH: rapidly degraded in acid, more stable in alkaline conditions. In parietal cells it is protonated, accumulates and is transformed to the active sulfenamide; in vitro it is chemically activated at pH 1.2 with a half-life of 78 seconds. A secondary encyclopedia table lists pKa 4.90 for rabeprazole versus 3.96 to 4.13 for pantoprazole, omeprazole and lansoprazole (not independently verified; primary source of the table not opened). Class background: PPI pyridine pKa about 4.0.[1] label 12.1; [38] Tier D, pKa only; [31]
What differs from other PPIs, and what does not
Matters for drug exposure, not shown to matter for nutrient status: (a) Clearance is partly independent of CYP2C19, but not wholly: CYP2C19*2 carriers showed about a 50% decrease in clearance for all PPIs studied, including rabeprazole [30], and the label says metabolism is slow in poor metabolizers [1]. (b) Fast activation concerns onset, not duration. (c) In 18 healthy volunteers, rabeprazole 20 mg gave less time with intragastric pH above 4 than esomeprazole 40 mg (40.3% vs 52.2%, P=0.003) [29]; if nutrient effects scale with pH elevation, a smaller effect at standard doses is plausible, but no nutrient study tests this (inference, not a finding). Does not matter: short plasma half-life (the effect is covalent and outlasts plasma), protein binding, renal route of metabolites, and the absence of induction. All PPIs share mechanism A, so rabeprazole's metabolism does not remove the class-level absorption concern. A rabeprazole-specific chemical finding, non-acidic activation at zinc-thiolate centres in vitro [9], is hypothesis-generating only.[1]; [9]; [29]; [30]

What the research says is worth watching

General information from the medication label and the studies above. It is not personal medical advice, and any change belongs with your prescriber.

  • Lab

    Serum magnesium

    Label: clinicians may consider monitoring magnesium before starting and periodically in prolonged treatment, and in patients also taking digoxin or diuretics; low magnesium may lead to low calcium or potassium [1][2]. Symptoms that prompt an earlier check include muscle spasm, tremor, palpitations, seizures and unusual tiredness or weakness [35].

  • Lab

    Vitamin B12

    Consider a measurement in long-term users (label frames more than about 3 years) when symptoms are consistent or other risks coincide [1]. Neuropathy or anemia is an outcome that prompts B12 testing; it is not itself a B12 result.

  • Lab

    Hemoglobin and iron indices

    Check ferritin with hemoglobin if anemia arises on long-term therapy, because rabeprazole-specific data are limited to a case report [10]. Interpretation depends on other causes; no supplement is advised from this panel.

  • Timing

    Drugs and iron salts needing stomach acid

    The label says rabeprazole can reduce absorption of drugs dependent on gastric pH, naming iron salts, erlotinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, mycophenolate mofetil, ketoconazole and itraconazole [1]. The text returned gives no separation interval; ask a prescriber or pharmacist. Digoxin exposure rose about 19% (AUC) with rabeprazole, a drug-drug interaction in the other direction [1].

  • At-risk groups

    Older adults, diuretic and digoxin users

    Strongest magnesium signal [1][4]. Hepatic impairment about doubles single-dose exposure; CYP2C19 poor metabolizers metabolize rabeprazole slowly [1]; end-stage renal disease showed no clinically significant pharmacokinetic differences [1].

  • Review

    Dose and duration

    Fracture and magnesium signals are tied by the label to high dose and use of a year or longer [1]. Reassessing the indication and duration is the main modifiable factor for the signals in this dossier.

  • Not prompted

    Zinc, copper, calcium, vitamin C, vitamin D

    Rabeprazole data are limited to a mouse study, a mixed-PPI minority, class cohorts that excluded rabeprazole or conflicting results. Test only for separate clinical reasons. No routine panel is justified by this dossier alone.

  • Special populations

    Pregnancy and pediatrics

    No pregnancy-specific or pediatric nutrient-status evidence for rabeprazole was located in the sources opened. Discuss with a prescriber.

Overlap map, to prevent double counting

Entries that rest on the same underlying source or mechanism. PPI class literature is shared with the sibling PPI dossiers in this batch.

  • Iron; Oxygen delivery/utilization

    Shares evidence with: Each other

    Note: The rabeprazole iron-deficiency anemia case [10] and the 37-user class cohort [11] feed both entries; anemia reaches the oxygen entry only through the iron mechanism. Count each source once.

  • Iron; Copper; Zinc; Oxygen delivery/utilization

    Shares evidence with: Each other

    Note: The 37-user PPI cohort [11] supplies iron, copper, zinc and hemoglobin values and did not include rabeprazole; one source, not four.

  • Zinc; Copper

    Shares evidence with: Study [8]

    Note: The zinc experiment [8] also reports a copper observation in controls; it contributes to the Zinc entry and is noted in Copper as a null.

  • Vitamin B12; Vitamin D; Iron; Zinc; Calcium

    Shares evidence with: Pantoprazole-only study [16]

    Note: One 30-versus-36 pantoprazole study supplies the class-context value for several entries; it is one source, not independent confirmation.

  • Vitamin B12; Vitamin D

    Shares evidence with: Randomized cohorts [15]

    Note: LOTUS/SOPRAN supplies the null for both entries; one source.

  • Magnesium; Calcium

    Shares evidence with: Label 5.8/5.9 [1][2]

    Note: The label ties hypocalcemia (and hypokalemia) to hypomagnesemia, so a low-calcium finding is not independent of the magnesium mechanism.

  • Calcium; Vitamin C; Iron; Zinc; Copper (class arms)

    Shares evidence with: Narrative review [12]

    Note: The review is the source for the omeprazole vitamin C and calcium carbonate class data and is also cited for iron, zinc and copper context; one second-hand source.

  • Oxidative stress; Mitochondrial burden

    Shares evidence with: Study [26]

    Note: The lysosome and ER-stress study [26] supplies the SOD finding in Oxidative stress and is noted in Mitochondrial burden as not mitochondrial; count it once. [27] feeds Mitochondrial burden only.

  • Gut microbiome risk (mouse studies)

    Shares evidence with: [22] and [23]

    Note: The two rabeprazole mouse studies share several authors; they are not fully independent confirmations of dysbiosis.

  • Magnesium; Vitamin B12; Gut microbiome risk; Iron

    Shares evidence with: PPI class literature shared with sibling dossiers [4][5][13][14][20]

    Note: These class-level studies pool several PPIs and recur in the omeprazole, esomeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole and dexlansoprazole dossiers; agreement among sibling dossiers is not independent evidence for rabeprazole.

  • Gut microbiome risk; Vitamin B12; Iron; Zinc

    Shares evidence with: Mechanism: raised gastric pH

    Note: All proposed class mechanisms flow from the same intended pharmacology; none is evidence for another.

  • Zinc; Oxidative stress

    Shares evidence with: Rabeprazole sulfenamide chemistry [9][26]

    Note: Both draw on rabeprazole's reactive-thiol chemistry in laboratory systems; neither measures a nutrient or redox state in people.

All references used above
  1. ACIPHEX (rabeprazole sodium) delayed-release tablets, U.S. prescribing information, Eisai Inc. (regulatory label; Tier A). — DailyMed, revision 11/04/2020. Sections 5.5, 5.7, 5.8, 6.2, 7, 12.1, 12.2, 12.3 read through a summarizing fetch tool, not as raw text.
  2. ACIPHEX (rabeprazole sodium) delayed-release tablets, U.S. prescribing information, Waylis Therapeutics LLC (regulatory label; Tier A). — DailyMed, revision 10/2025. Read through a summarizing fetch tool; used for the current section numbering of B12 (5.8) and hypomagnesemia (5.9), the hypocalcemia statement, the digoxin interaction figures and half-life. Pharmacokinetic detail was taken from [1].
  3. WHO Collaborating Centre ATC/DDD Index, A02BC04 rabeprazole. — ATC classification and DDD (20 mg, oral). Read through a summarizing fetch tool.
  4. Proton pump inhibitors and hospitalization with hypomagnesemia: a population-based case-control study. PLoS Med 2014 (authors not shown in the page extract). — 366 cases, 1,464 controls, Ontario, age 66 or older; omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole analyzed together. DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001736. Rabeprazole in cohort (named in the exposure list); read through a summarizing fetch tool.Class-pooled; no rabeprazole-specific estimate.
  5. Park et al. The association between the use of proton pump inhibitors and the risk of hypomagnesemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014. — 9 observational studies, 115,455 patients. DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0112558. Read through a summarizing fetch tool.Cohort test not passed: rabeprazole appears only as a search keyword; individual PPIs are not identified in the results. Tier C.
  6. Matsuyama J, Tsuji K, Doyama H, et al. Hypomagnesemia associated with a proton pump inhibitor. Intern Med 2012. — Case report, 64-year-old man, rabeprazole 10 mg/day for 5 years. Tier B. DOI 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.7748. PMID 22892510. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).
  7. Aydin Yoldemir S, Zeren Ozturk G, Akarsu M, Ozcan M. Is there a correlation between hypomagnesemia linked to long-term proton pump inhibitor use and the active agent? Wien Klin Wochenschr 2021 (PubMed lists 2022). — Cross-sectional, 305 adults on a PPI for 1 year or longer (omeprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole). Tier A, no non-PPI comparator, rabeprazole count not reported. DOI 10.1007/s00508-021-01834-x. PMID 33751184. Abstract read on the Springer page through a summarizing fetch tool; the Results and Conclusion text was requested verbatim.
  8. Farrell et al. Proton pump inhibitors interfere with zinc absorption and zinc body stores. Gastroenterology Research 2011. — Three-part experimental study; PPI users included Aciphex (rabeprazole) in Study 2 (1 of 6) and Study 3 (2 of 10). Read from a third-party hosted PDF copy through a summarizing fetch tool; DOI not shown in the extract.Mixed PPIs; very small samples; rabeprazole not analyzed separately.
  9. Marker T, Steimbach RR, Perez-Borrajero C, et al. Site-specific activation of the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole by tetrathiolate zinc centres. Nat Chem 2025;17(4):507-517. — In vitro and chemoproteomic study. Tier B, rabeprazole-specific. DOI 10.1038/s41557-025-01745-8. PMID 39979415. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Chemistry study; measures no nutrient status.
  10. Hashimoto R, Matsuda T, Chonan A. Iron-deficiency anemia caused by a proton pump inhibitor. Intern Med 2014. — Case report, 59-year-old man on rabeprazole; resolved after switch to famotidine. Tier B. DOI 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.2743. PMID 25318791. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).
  11. Kaczmarczyk et al. (first author as returned by the fetch tool). Effect of long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy on complete blood count parameters and selected trace elements: a pilot study. Pol Arch Intern Med 2019. — Cross-sectional, 37 PPI users (pantoprazole 18, esomeprazole 9, omeprazole 7, dexlansoprazole 2, lansoprazole 1) vs 30 healthy controls; hemoglobin, iron, copper, zinc; ferritin not measured. Read through a summarizing fetch tool.Cohort test not passed: rabeprazole not included. Tier C class extrapolation; healthy controls, mean age 57.1 vs 39.3.
  12. Urbas R, Huntington W, Napoleon LA, Wong P, Mullin JM. Malabsorption-related issues associated with chronic proton pump inhibitor usage. Austin J Nutr Metab 2016. — Narrative review; rabeprazole appears only in a citation of the Hashimoto case. Tier C. Read from a third-party hosted PDF copy through a summarizing fetch tool.Primary studies it cites (omeprazole ascorbic acid; omeprazole calcium carbonate) were not opened.
  13. Proton pump inhibitor and histamine 2 receptor antagonist use and vitamin B12 deficiency. JAMA 2013 (Kaiser Permanente case-control). — 25,956 cases, 184,199 controls, 1997 to 2011. Abstract page on the Kaiser Permanente research site read through a summarizing fetch tool.Cohort test not passed: no individual PPI named in the page opened. Tier C. JAMA full text not opened.
  14. Choudhury A, Jena A, Jearth V, et al. Vitamin B12 deficiency and use of proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023. — 25 studies. DOI 10.1080/17474124.2023.2204229. PMID 37060552. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Cohort test not passed: no per-PPI stratification; rabeprazole not named in the abstract. Tier C.
  15. Attwood SE, Ell C, Galmiche JP, et al. Long-term safety of proton pump inhibitor therapy assessed under controlled, randomised clinical trial conditions: data from the SOPRAN and LOTUS studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015;41(11):1162-1174. — SOPRAN (omeprazole, 12 years, n=298) and LOTUS (esomeprazole, 5 years, n=514) vs anti-reflux surgery. DOI 10.1111/apt.13194. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Cohort test not passed: rabeprazole not in either cohort; used only as class-level null context.
  16. Losurdo, Caccavo, Indellicati, et al. Effect of long-term proton pump inhibitor use on blood vitamins and minerals: a primary care setting study. J Clin Med 2023. — Cross-sectional case-control, pantoprazole 40 mg/day for more than 12 months (n=30) vs non-users (n=36). DOI 10.3390/jcm12082910. MDPI page read through a summarizing fetch tool.Cohort test not passed: pantoprazole only. Tier C for rabeprazole.
  17. Shaalan AAM, El-Sherbiny M, El-Abaseri TB, et al. Supplement with calcium or alendronate suppresses osteopenia due to long term rabeprazole treatment in female mice: influence on bone TRAP and osteopontin levels. Front Pharmacol 2020. — Mouse study, 80 female Swiss albino mice, rabeprazole 10 mg/kg every 48 h for 18 weeks. Tier B, rabeprazole-specific. DOI 10.3389/fphar.2020.00583. PMID 32477111. Frontiers page read through a summarizing fetch tool.Animal study; serum calcium units printed as U/L in the page text.
  18. Yamasaki Y, Fujimura T, Oyama K, et al. Effects of rabeprazole on bone metabolic disorders in a gastrectomized rat model. Biomed Rep 2016. — Male Wistar rats, total gastrectomy, 22 weeks. Tier B, rabeprazole-specific. DOI 10.3892/br.2016.689. PMID 27330752. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Animal study; opposite direction to [17] for bone density.
  19. Lespessailles E, Toumi H. Proton pump inhibitors and bone health: an update narrative review. Int J Mol Sci 2022. — Narrative review; rabeprazole named only in a list of approved PPIs. Tier C. DOI 10.3390/ijms231810733. MDPI page read through a summarizing fetch tool.No rabeprazole-specific data; used for class-level calcium inconsistency and to confirm it does not discuss vitamin D levels.
  20. F.I. et al. (surname not shown on the page extract; shared first authorship listed). Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome. Gut 2016;65(5):740. — Cross-sectional meta-analysis of three Dutch cohorts, n=1,815, 211 PPI users; rabeprazole listed among six PPIs counted; per-PPI numbers not reported. Journal page read through a summarizing fetch tool.Rabeprazole in cohort but not stratified; class-level.
  21. Hojo et al. Gut microbiota composition before and after use of proton pump inhibitors. Dig Dis Sci 2018. — 20 patients, 8 weeks of esomeprazole 20 mg, rabeprazole 10 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg daily. DOI 10.1007/s10620-018-5122-4. Springer page read through a summarizing fetch tool; the methods sentence naming the three PPIs was quoted by the tool.Rabeprazole in cohort; not stratified by PPI; single-arm.
  22. Takashima S, Tanaka F, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Proton pump inhibitors enhance intestinal permeability via dysbiosis of gut microbiota under stressed conditions in mice. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020. — C57BL/6J mice, rabeprazole 40 mg/kg. Tier B, rabeprazole-specific. DOI 10.1111/nmo.13841. PMID 32319196. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Animal study.
  23. Nadatani Y, Watanabe T, Suda W, et al. Gastric acid inhibitor aggravates indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury via reducing Lactobacillus johnsonii. Sci Rep 2019. — C57BL/6J mice, rabeprazole vs vonoprazan with indomethacin. Tier B, rabeprazole-specific. DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-53559-7. PMID 31767915. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Animal study; research group overlaps with [22].
  24. Ozbek A, Yildiz M, Altinkaya E, et al. Modulation of oxidative stress and nuclear factor-kappaB-associated inflammatory signaling by rabeprazole in acetic acid-induced colonic injury. Turk J Gastroenterol 2026. — Male Wistar rats, rabeprazole 20 mg/kg/day for 10 days. Tier B, rabeprazole-specific. DOI 10.5152/tjg.2026.26033. PMID 42186949. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Animal study.
  25. Abed MN, Alassaf FA, Jasim MHM, Alfahad MA, Qazzaz ME. Comparison of antioxidant effects of the proton pump-inhibiting drugs omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole. Pharmacology 2020. — In vitro DPPH radical-scavenging assay. Tier B, includes rabeprazole. DOI 10.1159/000506232. PMID 32289807. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).
  26. Lee WP. Suppression of vacuolar-type ATPase and induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress by proton pump inhibitors. J Chin Med Assoc 2022;85(9):915-921. — Cell and isolated-lysosome study of esomeprazole, pantoprazole, dexlansoprazole and rabeprazole, reported together. Tier B (class-pooled within the set). DOI 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000785. PMID 36150104. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Results not separated by drug; does not address mitochondria.
  27. Xiong ZC, Li XZ, You S, et al. Proton pump inhibitors accelerate vascular calcification via COX-2-mediated mitophagy inhibition in chronic kidney disease. Eur J Pharmacol 2026;1016:178609. — Rat CKD model; omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole. DOI 10.1016/j.ejphar.2026.178609. PMID 41617170. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Cohort test not passed: rabeprazole not mentioned in the record. Tier C class extrapolation.
  28. Kawasaki R, Toida C, Kamijo H, et al. A case of methemoglobinemia suspected to be induced by rabeprazole. Acute Med Surg 2026. — Case report, 82-year-old woman, positive rechallenge. Tier B, rabeprazole-specific. DOI 10.1002/ams2.70130. PMID 41988631. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Single case; suspected causality; methemoglobin values not captured.
  29. Hunfeld NG, Touw DJ, Mathot RAA, van Schaik RHN, Kuipers EJ. A comparison of the acid-inhibitory effects of esomeprazole and rabeprazole in relation to pharmacokinetics and CYP2C19 polymorphism. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012. — Randomized crossover, 18 healthy H. pylori-negative subjects, esomeprazole 40 mg vs rabeprazole 20 mg; time with pH above 4 52.2% vs 40.3% (P=0.003). DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05014.x. PMID 22324425. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool); the day of measurement was not captured.Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic context only; no nutrient measured.
  30. Roman M, Ochoa D, Sanchez-Rojas SD, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between polymorphisms in CYP2C19 and the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole. Pharmacogenomics 2014. — 151 healthy volunteers; CYP2C19*2 carriers about 50% decrease in clearance for all PPIs studied. DOI 10.2217/pgs.14.141. PMID 25495411. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool); per-drug figures not captured.Pharmacokinetic context only.
  31. Shin JM, Sachs G. Pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2008. — Review abstract: PPI pyridine pKa about 4.0, benzimidazole second pKa about 1.0. DOI 10.1007/s11894-008-0098-4. Springer abstract page read through a summarizing fetch tool.Abstract only; no rabeprazole-specific pKa given.
  32. Garcia-Torres I, De la Mora-De la Mora I, Hernandez-Alcantara G, et al. First characterization of a microsporidial triosephosphate isomerase and the biochemical mechanisms of its inactivation to propose a new druggable target. Sci Rep 2018. — In vitro parasite enzyme study; rabeprazole inactivated the microsporidial enzyme. DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-26845-z. PMID 29872223. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Not human tissue and not a measure of ATP; listed because it was the only PubMed hit for the ATP query; supports no grade.
  33. Akter S, Hassan MR, Shahriar M, et al. Cognitive impact after short-term exposure to different proton pump inhibitors: assessment using CANTAB software. Alzheimers Res Ther 2015. — 60 volunteers, 7 days, five PPIs including rabeprazole. DOI 10.1186/s13195-015-0164-8. PMID 26714488. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Rabeprazole in cohort but no B12 measurement reported; cited only to show why it does not support a B12 grade.
  34. Drugs.com. Rabeprazole professional or consumer monograph page (Tier D). — Consumer content used only to enumerate circulating claims.Tier D: supports no claim at any level.
  35. Drugs.com. Aciphex side effects page (Tier D). — Consumer content used only to enumerate circulating claims.Tier D: supports no claim at any level.
  36. Healthline. Rabeprazole oral tablet (Tier D). — Consumer content used only to enumerate circulating claims.Tier D: supports no claim at any level.
  37. RxList. Aciphex (reprint of the prescribing information). — Reprint of label text; not an independent source. Used only to confirm wording.Not independent of [1]; Tier D for claim-audit purposes.
  38. Wikipedia. Rabeprazole (Tier D). — Encyclopedia content used to enumerate circulating claims and for the pKa table (rabeprazole 4.90; omeprazole 4.13; lansoprazole 4.01; pantoprazole 3.96). The table's primary source was not opened.Tier D: supports no claim at any level.
  39. Drugs.com. Rabeprazole patient information page (Tier D). — Consumer content used only to enumerate circulating claims.Tier D: supports no claim at any level.
  40. Hansen KE, Jones AN, Lindstrom MJ, et al. Do proton pump inhibitors decrease calcium absorption? J Bone Miner Res 2010. — Prospective trial, 21 postmenopausal women, omeprazole 40 mg/day for 30 days; fractional calcium absorption by dual stable isotope. DOI 10.1002/jbmr.166. PMID 20578215. Abstract via OpenAlex lookup (summarizing fetch tool).Cohort test not passed: omeprazole only. Tier C; used as class-level null.