Skip to main content

Misoprostol

synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog (gastric antisecretory and mucosal protective)

Also sold as Cytotec.

Findings for this medication

Research about this medication, graded for how strongly each finding can be attributed to it. Nothing here describes your own levels.

Misoprostol has no classical depletion machinery. It is absorbed quickly, converted by de-esterification to the active free acid (misoprostol acid), cleared with a half-life of 20 to 40 minutes, handled by fatty-acid-type oxidation, and excreted about 80% in urine [1]. The label sections retrieved do not mention any vitamin, mineral or electrolyte, and do not describe any enzyme induction or inhibition [1]. Two things in the label matter for this review and neither is a nutrient deficiency. First, the dominant adverse effect is dose-related diarrhea (14 to 40% at 800 mcg daily in controlled NSAID trials, averaging 13% across all studies of more than 5,000 patients), and the label advises avoiding magnesium-containing antacids because they aggravate it [1]. Second, the pregnancy contraindication (boxed warning: birth defects, abortion, premature birth, uterine rupture) is the drug's own toxicity and has no bearing on nutrient status [1]. Under Hard Rule 2 and Hard Rule 5, fluid and electrolyte loss from diarrhea is a disturbance that the label describes as usually self-limiting, not a deficiency, and no study retrieved measured any electrolyte or nutrient in misoprostol users.

synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog (gastric antisecretory and mucosal protective) · ATC A02BB01 (WHO ATC/DDD Index [2]); low-strength labor-induction tablets G02AD06 · also sold as Cytotec; many generics · reviewed 2026-10-04. This describes research about the medication. It does not say anything about your own levels or health.

How to read the evidence grades

These colours describe how strongly a finding can be attributed to the medication in the research. They are not a severity score and they say nothing about your own health.

Grades describe how strongly a finding can be attributed to Misoprostol in the research — not how common it is, how serious it would be, and not anything about you personally.

Red — Severe
Two or more independent Tier A sources, this drug in the cohort, the nutrient directly measured, consistent direction, clinically meaningful magnitude, a named mechanism, no substantial contradicting Tier A evidence.
Orange — Moderate
At least one Tier A source with this drug in the cohort showing a real but bounded deficit: an exposure window, a subgroup, low frequency, or a functional rather than circulating deficit.
Yellow — Low
Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction.
Not graded — disclosed evidence gap
Nothing has been measured here, so this finding cannot be graded. That does not establish either safety or harm, and it is not the same as a White result.Source definition: Not gradeable under the rules above because nothing has been measured. Published as a documented gap, never as reassurance that there is no effect.

What the research found

Fluid and electrolytes: dose-related diarrhea (disturbance, not nutrient depletion)

Yellow — Low

See study details

Dose-related diarrhea is the label's dominant adverse effect and could cause transient fluid and electrolyte loss, but no study retrieved measured sodium, potassium, magnesium or any other nutrient in misoprostol users. Direction: disturbance (transient loss through an adverse effect), not depletion.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: None located; no measurement exists to be null. The label describes the diarrhea as usually self-limiting [1].
  • At-risk subgroups: Inflammatory bowel disease, patients who cannot tolerate dehydration, older adults (higher misoprostol acid AUC over 64 years), renal impairment (about 2-fold exposure), and anyone taking magnesium-containing antacids or diuretics [1].

Regulatory status

Label: diarrhea at 800 mcg daily ranged 14 to 40% in controlled trials and averaged 13% across all studies (over 5,000 patients); abdominal pain 13 to 20% in NSAID trials and about 7% overall. Diarrhea is dose related, usually develops early, and is usually self-limiting (often resolving after about 8 days). The label tells prescribers to monitor patients with inflammatory bowel disease or those in whom dehydration would be dangerous, and to avoid magnesium-containing antacids [1]. These figures were read through a summarizing fetch tool; one extracted phrase about timing of onset was garbled and is not reproduced.

Population evidence

Only the label trial pool [1]. No electrolyte or nutrient measurement in misoprostol users was found in any source opened. A case report titled as life-threatening diarrhea in a patient with Crohn ileocolitis (Ann Intern Med 1990) was seen as a title only and could not be opened (403), so it is not used.

Mechanism

Present for secretion. A guinea pig enterocyte study states that prostaglandins of the E series stimulate intestinal water and electrolyte secretion through adenylate cyclase, that misoprostol and enprostil were less potent than PGE2 in that model, and that the authors judged the diarrheogenic effect of misoprostol unlikely to be mediated primarily by adenylate cyclase [16]. The mechanism is therefore incompletely resolved (Tier B, animal cells).

Interaction direction

Hard Rule 4: the relationship runs from the antacid to the drug's adverse effect. Magnesium-containing antacids worsen misoprostol diarrhea [1], and any antacid lowers misoprostol acid availability [1]. This is an avoidance and timing interaction, not a depletion. A Tier D interaction page says the same and is corroborative only [19].

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence and confounding Diarrhea in this population is also caused by the NSAIDs, the underlying disease and other drugs. Fluid and electrolyte loss during an episode is a hydration problem, not evidence of a nutrient-poor state. Framing caution This is a disturbance during diarrhea, not a dietary deficiency. Do not recommend magnesium, potassium or other supplements from this entry. Taking more magnesium (including magnesium antacids) is the hazard for this drug, not the remedy.

The five body-system areas

Each finding is counted once, in a single area. Where a study is mentioned in a second area it is context only.

Mitochondrial Burden

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Mitochondrial burden: reverse direction in injury models, no normoxic-alone data

Yellow — Low

See study details

Misoprostol preserved mitochondrial membrane potential and function in toxin and hypoxia models; no study retrieved showed mitochondrial toxicity.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Normal liver histology after 9 days of misoprostol in rats [10] (structure only, not a mitochondrial assay). No normoxic misoprostol-alone mitochondrial assay was found in the sources opened.
  • At-risk subgroups: None identified.

Regulatory status

Not addressed in the label [1].

Population evidence

Cells and animals only (Tier B). PC12 cells: misoprostol significantly attenuated the MPP+-induced mitochondrial membrane permeability change, reduced pro-apoptotic proteins and caspase-3 activation, and protected against rotenone [11]. Hypoxia (48 hours, 10% O2) lowered mitochondrial membrane potential in the cell models used (HCT-116, H9c2 and primary neonatal myocytes were the systems listed), and 10 uM misoprostol completely attenuated this; in vivo dosing was 10 mcg/kg subcutaneously [12]. In neonatal mice and cardiomyocytes, hypoxia reduced basal, maximal and spare respiratory capacity and misoprostol abrogated this [13].

Mechanism

PKA-mediated repression of full-length Bnip3 and induction of pro-survival splice variants, which block ER-to-mitochondria calcium transfer and permeability transition [12]; PKA phosphorylation of Bnip3 at threonine-181 [13].

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence and confounding The conditions are rescue models, so the data show protection against injury, not behavior of healthy mitochondria. Findings were read through a summarizing fetch tool for [12] and [13]. Framing caution Reverse-direction, preclinical. It says nothing about human mitochondrial burden and is not a basis for any supplement recommendation.

Oxidative Stress

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Oxidative stress: reverse or neutral direction, animal and in vitro

Yellow — Low

See study details

Misoprostol alone did not raise oxidative-stress markers in rats, and it reduced toxin-induced markers in animal and cell models. No human redox marker study was located.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Misoprostol-alone groups showed no change in kidney markers [9] and no change in liver GSH or MDA [10].
  • At-risk subgroups: None. Not a depletion finding.

Regulatory status

Not addressed in the label [1].

Population evidence

Rats, paclitaxel kidney model: 28 female Sprague Dawley rats, 4 groups of 7, misoprostol 0.2 mg/kg orally. Paclitaxel raised MDA, creatinine and BUN and lowered SOD, GSH and catalase; adding misoprostol reversed these; the misoprostol-alone group showed no significant difference from control [9]. Rats, liver: 24 male Sprague Dawley rats, misoprostol 100 mcg/kg twice daily for 9 days (tissue taken day 10), with or without celecoxib 40 mg/kg; liver GSH (ANOVA p=0.4878) and MDA showed no group difference and histology was normal [10]. Cells: in differentiated PC12 cells, misoprostol blocked MPP+-induced ROS formation and GSH depletion [11]. Hypoxia models: misoprostol prevented hypoxia-induced superoxide accumulation in cells [12] and in neonatal mouse heart [13].

Mechanism

Protective signaling through PKA and Bnip3 regulation is proposed in the hypoxia papers [12][13]; PC12 authors attribute protection to suppressed ROS formation and prevented GSH loss [11]. No pro-oxidant mechanism for misoprostol was found.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence and confounding Doses are not human-equivalent, tissues are not the gut, and the protective models use toxins or hypoxia that have no counterpart in routine misoprostol use. Two additional rat studies of misoprostol with doxorubicin were seen as titles only and not opened. Framing caution Reverse-direction finding. It must not be presented as a benefit to consumers or as evidence that antioxidant supplements are needed or unnecessary.

Copper and Iron Balance

Copper and iron are assessed separately. Nothing here is counted twice.

Copper

Not graded — disclosed evidence gap

See study details

No evidence located on misoprostol and copper status.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Nothing has been measured here, so this finding cannot be graded. That does not establish either safety or harm, and it is not the same as a White result. Ungraded

Limits on what this shows

  • Why no grade: Dual condition met: no Tier B or C source located, and no circulating consumer claim about misoprostol and copper was found to rebut. Gap type: tooling-limited as well as possible genuine gap, because PubMed, PMC, OpenAlex search, Crossref search and further WebSearch were unavailable. Not a finding of safety. Kept independent of Iron (Hard Rule 7). Re-check when PubMed access is restored.

Channels tried

DailyMed Pfizer Cytotec label (no mineral mention) [1]. WebSearch "misoprostol iron absorption OR ferritin OR iron deficiency OR copper OR zinc serum levels": results were generic mineral pages, none naming misoprostol. Crossref bibliographic search "misoprostol copper OR zinc OR trace element": 429, not retried. Crossref iron query drifted to unrelated ferritin literature. OpenAlex search: 429. A WebSearch for nutrient-depletion lists naming misoprostol: no misoprostol entry; the Riordan Clinic handout [17] and a chiropractic-clinic PDF [18] were opened and do not mention misoprostol or prostaglandins. The Antidote Research misoprostol page URL returned 404. A final WebSearch hit its session cap (200 of 200).

Iron

Not graded — disclosed evidence gap

See study details

No iron-status measurement in misoprostol users was located.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Nothing has been measured here, so this finding cannot be graded. That does not establish either safety or harm, and it is not the same as a White result. Ungraded

Limits on what this shows

  • Why no grade: Dual condition met: no Tier B or C iron evidence and no circulating iron claim for misoprostol. Hemoglobin outcomes are filed under Oxygen delivery/utilization as bleeding outcomes (Hard Rule 2: anemia is not iron deficiency). Gap type: tooling-limited as well as possible genuine gap. Not a finding of safety.

Channels tried

Label (no iron mention) [1]; the same WebSearch, Crossref and OpenAlex attempts listed under Copper; the PubMed listing of misoprostol with hemoglobin and postpartum hemorrhage (returned hemoglobin outcomes, no ferritin or iron-indices outcome) [8]; Sci Rep cohort [4] (hemoglobin fall only, no iron indices). Circulating-claim sources [17][18] do not mention misoprostol. The PubMed ferritin, iron and misoprostol search page itself was not retrieved (429).

Gut Microbiome Risk

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Gut microbiome risk: animal data only, direction unresolved

Yellow — Low

See study details

A mouse study found misoprostol favorable for microbiota recovery and C. difficile outcomes, and a small horse study found a composition difference without named taxa or diversity change. No human microbiome study was located.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Horse diversity indices showed no treatment effect [15]. No dysbiosis or loss of commensals attributable to misoprostol was reported in either source.
  • At-risk subgroups: None identified. Humans on antibiotics or with C. difficile are the setting of the mouse model and not a population in which misoprostol use was studied.

Regulatory status

No microbiome statement in the label sections retrieved [1].

Population evidence

Mouse C. difficile model: misoprostol protected against C. difficile-associated mortality, intestinal pathology and permeability, and promoted recovery of the gut microbiota after antibiotic perturbation; read from an abstract page via a summarizing fetch, with sample size and dose not captured [14]. Horses: 6 healthy geldings given 5 mcg/kg orally or rectally every 8 hours for 10 doses; Shannon and Simpson diversity did not differ (P over.05), community composition differed between treatments (P at or below.01), no taxa were identified at any level, and no diarrhea or change in fecal consistency was noted [15].

Mechanism

Named in the mouse paper only at the level of prostaglandins as host factors for recovery [14]. Whether diarrhea itself shifts stool microbiota in humans on misoprostol was not tested in any source opened.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence and confounding Species and dose differences are large, the mouse result is a protective finding, and the horse composition difference is uninterpreted. Neither is evidence of microbiome harm in people. Framing caution This is not a claim of dysbiosis. Do not extend PPI or other acid-suppressor microbiome findings to misoprostol; they were not used here.

Oxygen and ATP Output

Oxygen delivery and ATP production are assessed separately. Nothing here is counted twice.

Oxygen delivery/utilization: hemoglobin as a bleeding outcome, reverse direction

Yellow — Low

See study details

Hemoglobin was reported in misoprostol obstetric trials and one NSAID cohort, but in every case it measures blood loss or protection from it, not a drug effect on oxygen-carrying capacity. The only drug-in-cohort NSAID data run in the protective direction.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: The listing summary reports several PPH trials with no significant misoprostol-versus-comparator hemoglobin difference [8]; none of those individual trials were opened.
  • At-risk subgroups: Not applicable as a drug-caused deficit. Patients with existing GI bleeding or heavy menstrual loss have anemia from those causes (Hard Rule 6).

Regulatory status

The label lists anemia, abnormal differential, thrombocytopenia, purpura and raised ESR under Blood/Coagulation adverse events; the frequency tier and any causality assessment were not captured in retrieval [1].

Population evidence

NSAID users: retrospective cohort, 9,133 osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis patients on NSAIDs for 1 month or more, Samsung Medical Center 1995 to 2014. Occult GI bleeding was defined as a hemoglobin fall of at least 2 g/dL and occurred in 1,191 (13%) over a median 27 weeks. Misoprostol (named among the gastroprotective agents) had HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.95) versus non-users; misoprostol dose was not specified in the text retrieved [4]. Obstetric: a Tunisian placebo-controlled RCT of 400 mcg sublingual misoprostol (211 women) reported a smaller hemoglobin fall with misoprostol (1.21 vs 1.51 per 100 mL, p=0.02; wording and units come from a reconstructed OpenAlex abstract and are ambiguous) [5]. In 128 preeclamptic cesarean patients, the reconstructed abstract reports 24-hour hemoglobin of 10.39 and 9.53 with rectal and sublingual misoprostol versus 11.05 with oxytocin (lower with misoprostol, no baseline given), while a PubMed listing summary described the same trial as improved hemoglobin and hematocrit; the two summaries contradict each other and the trial is not used for direction [6][8]. A meta-analysis of tranexamic acid versus misoprostol for PPH was seen as metadata with a listing-level summary of no significant difference in hemoglobin change; its abstract was not opened [7][8]. A placebo-controlled RCT of misoprostol 200 mcg four times daily for 8 weeks in 84 aspirin users with small bowel bleeding found complete small bowel ulcer healing in 28.6% vs 9.5% (P=.026) [3]; one fetch returned a hemoglobin mean difference for this trial that was absent from the verbatim abstract on a second fetch, so no hemoglobin figure is used.

Mechanism

No mechanism for reduced oxygen delivery is named. Hemoglobin falls in the obstetric trials reflect blood loss, hemodilution and baseline maternal status. In NSAID users, a lower rate of hemoglobin fall is consistent with the drug's intended mucosal protection, which is a therapeutic effect, not a nutrient finding.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence and confounding The cohort [4] is retrospective with confounding by indication; the authors note residual confounding from H. pylori and smoking and that menorrhagia was not excluded. Obstetric hemoglobin reflects delivery blood loss and the comparator (oxytocin or placebo), and the trials give no pre-treatment iron or hemoglobin status for a nutrient reading. Framing caution Anemia is not iron deficiency and a hemoglobin change is not an oxygen-delivery deficiency (Hard Rule 2). No nutrient claim is made. This entry is a context flag only.

ATP production: reverse direction, single animal source

Yellow — Low

See study details

One animal study reported cardiac ATP lowered by hypoxia and higher with misoprostol; nothing suggests misoprostol reduces cellular ATP output.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: None located. No normoxic misoprostol-alone ATP data found.
  • At-risk subgroups: None identified.

Regulatory status

Not addressed in the label [1].

Population evidence

Neonatal mouse hypoxia model (10% O2, postnatal days 3 to 10): cardiac ATP fell with hypoxia, and with misoprostol 10 mcg/kg subcutaneously "ATP levels were elevated beyond that observed in normoxic animals" (quoted from the summarizing fetch) [13]. Title taken from the search-result listing; authors and journal were not captured.

Mechanism

Preserved respiratory capacity and membrane potential through the PKA/Bnip3 axis [13]. Shared with the mitochondrial entry (see Overlap map).

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence and confounding Single source, animal model, neonatal heart under hypoxia, read through a summarizer. Not independent of the mitochondrial entry. Framing caution Not a claim about human energy levels. Kept independent of Mitochondrial burden and Oxygen delivery/utilization (Hard Rule 7).

Claims checked and not supported

These circulate online for this medication. They are listed here only so they can be answered, never as findings, and they are not graded.

A claim with no supporting evidence is not necessarily disproven. Where evidence actually argues against a claim, that is stated below.

  • None located: no misoprostol-specific nutrient, mitochondrial, oxidative-stress, copper, iron, microbiome, oxygen or ATP depletion claim was found

    Where it comes from: Opened: Riordan Clinic medication-nutrient depletion handout [17] and a chiropractic-clinic depletion PDF [18], both of which cover GI drug classes (antacids, PPIs, H2 blockers, bisacodyl laxatives) but do not mention misoprostol. The Antidote Research misoprostol page returned 404. A Drugs.com interaction page [19] states only that magnesium-containing antacids worsen misoprostol diarrhea.

    Why it fails: There is no claim to rebut. The mineral list in [17] (beta-carotene, folic acid, vitamin D, calcium, magnesium, chromium, iron, zinc, phosphorus) is attached to aluminum-magnesium antacids, not to misoprostol, and is not carried over. The drugs.com statement is not a depletion claim and agrees with the label [1]. Claim search was partly limited by an exhausted WebSearch budget, so unseen retailer pages may carry claims; re-check later.

How the body handles this medication

Absorption and activation
Extensively absorbed, then rapidly de-esterified to misoprostol acid, which is the clinically active form and is detectable in plasma (the parent compound is not). Tmax 12 +/- 3 minutes; terminal half-life 20 to 40 minutes. Serum protein binding of the acid is below 90%.[1] DailyMed Pfizer Cytotec label, sec 12.3 (read via summarizing fetch)
Food and antacid effects
Fasting Cmax 811 +/- 317 pg/mL (Tmax 14 +/- 8 min); with a high-fat breakfast Cmax 303 +/- 176 pg/mL (Tmax 64 +/- 79 min). Total availability of misoprostol acid is reduced by concomitant antacid. Diarrhea is minimized by dosing after meals and at bedtime and by avoiding magnesium-containing antacids.[1] sec 12.3, dosage and administration
Metabolism and enzymes
Metabolized like a fatty acid: beta oxidation of the alpha side chain, omega oxidation of the beta side chain, then ketone reduction to prostaglandin F analogs. The label sections retrieved do not discuss cytochrome P450 induction or inhibition, so no enzyme effect is claimed here.[1] sec 12.3, overdosage
Elimination
About 80% of detected radioactivity after oral radiolabeled dosing appears in urine. Because of fatty-acid-type metabolism, dialysis is unlikely to be useful in overdose.[1] sec 12.3, overdosage
Renal impairment and age
Renal impairment roughly doubles half-life, Cmax and AUC; no routine dose adjustment is recommended. In subjects over 64 years, misoprostol acid AUC is increased. Pediatric safety and effectiveness are not established.[1] sec 12.3, 8
Interactions and toxicity
No effect on ibuprofen or diclofenac kinetics; aspirin AUC about 20% lower (not clinically significant); no interaction with antipyrine, propranolol or diazepam. Boxed warning for pregnancy; patients with inflammatory bowel disease or in whom dehydration would be dangerous should be monitored. Postmenopausal vaginal bleeding may occur.[1] boxed warning, sec 5, 7

What the research says is worth watching

General information from the medication label and the studies above. It is not personal medical advice, and any change belongs with your prescriber.

  • Tolerability / hydration

    Diarrhea and hydration

    Diarrhea is dose related and usually early and self-limiting. The label advises dosing after meals and at bedtime. People with inflammatory bowel disease or conditions where dehydration would be dangerous should be monitored by the prescriber [1].

  • Timing / avoidance

    Magnesium-containing antacids

    Avoid co-administration with magnesium-containing antacids because they aggravate diarrhea; any antacid also lowers misoprostol acid availability [1]. The label gives no numeric separation interval in the sections retrieved. This is a drug-side interaction, not a nutrient deficiency. No supplement dose is recommended or appears anywhere in this dossier, so no upper-limit comparison was needed.

  • Lab / only if indicated

    Serum sodium, potassium, magnesium

    Worth considering only if diarrhea is severe or prolonged, or if a diuretic or other electrolyte-lowering drug is co-prescribed. No study measured these in misoprostol users, so this is a hydration check, not a depletion screen.

  • Lab / bleeding

    Hemoglobin

    A complete blood count belongs to evaluation of GI blood loss or heavy bleeding in NSAID users, which is the indication context. Falling hemoglobin should prompt a bleeding work-up, not an assumption of drug-caused anemia.

  • Special population

    Pregnancy and reproductive age

    Boxed warning and contraindication in pregnancy: birth defects, abortion, premature birth, uterine rupture [1]. This is the drug's own toxicity, not a nutrient matter. Postmenopausal vaginal bleeding should be investigated [1].

  • Special population

    Renal impairment, older age, pediatrics

    Renal impairment roughly doubles exposure; no routine dose change is advised. Misoprostol acid AUC is higher over 64 years. Pediatric safety is not established [1].

Overlap map, to prevent double counting

  • Mitochondrial burden

    Shares evidence with: ATP production; Oxidative stress

    Note: Same Bnip3/PKA hypoxia papers [12][13] and the PC12 paper [11]. The ATP entry rests on [13] alone, which also supplies respiration and membrane-potential findings for the mitochondrial entry; the superoxide and ROS/GSH results in [11][12][13] also appear in the oxidative-stress entry. Treat as one body of preclinical evidence, not three independent confirmations.

  • Oxidative stress

    Shares evidence with: Mitochondrial burden

    Note: The rat studies [9][10] are unique to oxidative stress; the cell and hypoxia studies [11][12][13] are shared with the mitochondrial entry.

  • Oxygen delivery/utilization

    Shares evidence with: Iron (ungraded)

    Note: Hemoglobin outcomes [3][4][5][6] are bleeding outcomes and are not used as iron evidence. The Iron gap is not filled by hemoglobin data (Hard Rule 2).

  • Fluid and electrolytes

    Shares evidence with: Gut microbiome risk

    Note: No shared source. Diarrhea could transiently alter stool composition, but that was not tested in [14][15] and is not claimed.

  • Copper

    Shares evidence with: Iron

    Note: No shared source; both ungraded for the same search outcomes and tooling limits. Graded separately per Hard Rule 7, and the access gap is one gap seen twice.

All references used above
  1. CYTOTEC (misoprostol) tablet, prescribing information, Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc (DailyMed set ID 4ab12da7-5731-4e06-bf1c-bc3f2e711f12). — Regulatory label (Tier A). Opened through a summarizing fetch tool three times; boxed warning, adverse reactions, sec 12.3 and warnings read. Revision shown as April 2026 (prescribing information) in the summary; the DailyMed listing shows version 22, published Jun 05, 2026. A fetch of other DailyMed labels (Physicians Total Care 2010, Apotheca 2010) was not opened.
  2. WHO Collaborating Centre, ATC/DDD Index: misoprostol, A02BB01, DDD 0.8 mg. — Reference index. Note on 25 mcg labor-induction tablets classified in G02AD06.
  3. Kyaw MH, Otani K, Ching JYL, et al. Misoprostol heals small bowel ulcers in aspirin users with small bowel bleeding. Gastroenterology 2018;155(4):1090-1097.e1. — Double-blind RCT, 84 aspirin users, misoprostol 200 mcg four times daily vs placebo for 8 weeks; DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.056. Abstract read via ScienceDirect through a summarizing fetch; full text not opened. Tier A for ulcer healing; no hemoglobin figure used.
  4. Effectiveness of acid suppressants and other mucoprotective agents in reducing the risk of occult gastrointestinal bleeding in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users. Sci Rep 2019. — Retrospective cohort, 9,133 patients, Samsung Medical Center 1995 to 2014; misoprostol HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.95). Authors not captured in retrieval. Read via summarizing fetch (two fetches).
  5. Randomized controlled trial comparing 400 mcg sublingual misoprostol versus placebo for prevention of primary postpartum hemorrhage. Pan Afr Med J 2020;36:186. — Double-blind RCT, 211 women, Tunisia. DOI 10.11604/pamj.2020.36.186.22538. Abstract reconstructed from OpenAlex via summarizing fetch; wording ambiguous on the hemoglobin figures.
  6. Prophylactic effect of rectal and sublingual misoprostol on postpartum hemorrhage in mothers with preeclampsia following cesarean section surgery; a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Ann Med Surg 2022. — RCT, 128 women. DOI 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104175. Abstract reconstructed from OpenAlex via summarizing fetch; the PubMed listing summary described the result in the opposite direction.Contradictory secondary summaries; not used for direction.
  7. Tranexamic acid versus misoprostol for management of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023 (PMID 37832480). — DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.10.006. OpenAlex metadata only (abstract null); the finding of no significant hemoglobin difference comes from a PubMed listing summary.Abstract not opened; active-comparator design (tranexamic acid), so it does not test misoprostol against non-use.
  8. PubMed search listing: misoprostol hemoglobin postpartum hemorrhage randomized (20 records, summarized by the fetch tool). — Used only for context on how many PPH trials report hemoglobin. Individual trials other than [5][6][7] were not opened. Two other PubMed listing pages (misoprostol with oxidative stress, with mitochondria) returned 429 and were not read.
  9. Aktas I, Yahyazadeh A. Protective potential of misoprostol against kidney alteration via alleviating oxidative stress in rat following exposure to paclitaxel. Tissue Cell 2022. — Animal study, 28 female Sprague Dawley rats; misoprostol 0.2 mg/kg orally. Abstract read via summarizing fetch (ScienceDirect).
  10. Murrell DE, Denham JW, Harirforoosh S. Histopathology and oxidative stress analysis of concomitant misoprostol and celecoxib administration. J Toxicol Pathol 2015. — Animal study, 24 male Sprague Dawley rats (6 per group), misoprostol 100 mcg/kg twice daily, 9 days dosing; liver GSH and MDA. Read via the Chapman University repository PDF through a summarizing fetch. The PMC copy returned reCAPTCHA.
  11. Choi EJ, Han JH, Lee CS. Prostaglandin analogue misoprostol attenuates neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium-induced mitochondrial damage and cell death in differentiated PC12 cells. Brain Res Bull 2008. — In vitro. Abstract read via ScienceDirect through a summarizing fetch.
  12. Field JT, Martens MD, Mughal W, et al. Misoprostol regulates Bnip3 repression and alternative splicing to control cellular calcium homeostasis during hypoxic stress. Cell Death Discov 2018. — In vitro (HCT-116, H9c2, primary myocytes; 10 uM) and a rodent neonatal hypoxia model (10 mcg/kg subcutaneously). Read via summarizing fetch.
  13. Misoprostol treatment prevents hypoxia-induced cardiac dysfunction through a 14-3-3 and PKA regulatory motif on Bnip3. Cell Death Dis 2021 (journal inferred from the s41419 URL prefix). — Neonatal mouse hypoxia model, primary cardiomyocytes, H9c2, iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. Title from a search-result listing; authors, journal and year were not captured by the fetch tool. Read via summarizing fetch.Single source for the ATP entry; citation details incomplete.
  14. Zackular JP, Kirk L, Trindade BC, Skaar EP, Aronoff DM. Misoprostol protects mice against severe Clostridium difficile infection and promotes recovery of the gut microbiota after antibiotic perturbation. Anaerobe 2019;58:89-94. — Mouse study. DOI 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.06.006. Abstract page read via summarizing fetch; sample size and dose not captured. The PMC copy returned reCAPTCHA.
  15. Pfeifle RL, Ericsson AC, McCoy AM, et al. Multidose misoprostol pharmacokinetics and its effect on the fecal microbiome in healthy, adult horses. Am J Vet Res 2023;84(3). — 6 horses; 5 mcg/kg orally or rectally every 8 hours for 10 doses. Read via summarizing fetch.
  16. Pawlotsky JM, Ruszniewski P, Reyl-Desmars F, Bourgeois M, Lewin MJM. Effects of PGE2, misoprostol, and enprostil on guinea pig enterocyte adenylate cyclase. Dig Dis Sci 1993. — In vitro, isolated guinea pig intestinal epithelial cells. Abstract read via summarizing fetch (verbatim abstract returned).
  17. Riordan Clinic. Medication-induced nutrient depletion (handout). — Tier D. Opened only to check for circulating claims; does not mention misoprostol. Lists mineral and vitamin depletions under aluminum-magnesium antacids and calcium and potassium under bisacodyl laxatives.
  18. Chiropractic clinic. Nutrient depletion that arises from using prescribed medications (PDF; filename dated 17 Dec). — Tier D. Opened only to check for circulating claims; does not mention misoprostol, Cytotec or prostaglandins.
  19. Drugs.com. Drug interactions between magnesium oxide and misoprostol. — Tier D. States that magnesium-containing antacids can worsen misoprostol-induced diarrhea; corroborates the label [1] and is not used as evidence.