Skip to main content

Etodolac

pyranocarboxylic acid NSAID, COX-2 preferential [3]

Also sold as Lodine.

Findings for this medication

Research about this medication, graded for how strongly each finding can be attributed to it. Nothing here describes your own levels.

Etodolac has almost no classical depletion machinery. It is extensively metabolized in the liver (hydroxylated metabolites and a glucuronide; the label says the role of any specific cytochrome P450 is unknown), about 1% leaves unchanged in urine, it is more than 99% albumin bound, and its label names no vitamin or mineral [1]. The signals that exist run through the drug's own toxicity: GI bleeding, anemia and rare hemolytic anemia, fluid retention and renal effects [1]. Per Hard Rule 2 these are outcomes, and per Hard Rule 5 the sodium and potassium findings are retention or dilution effects, so supplementation would be the hazard and not the remedy. Red and orange tiers are empty; all 9 graded entries are yellow and 2 are ungraded.

pyranocarboxylic acid NSAID, COX-2 preferential [3] · ATC M01AB08 (WHO ATC/DDD Index [2]) · also sold as Lodine and Lodine SR [3]; many generics · reviewed 2026-10-07. This describes research about the medication. It does not say anything about your own levels or health.

How to read the evidence grades

These colours describe how strongly a finding can be attributed to the medication in the research. They are not a severity score and they say nothing about your own health.

Grades describe how strongly a finding can be attributed to Etodolac in the research — not how common it is, how serious it would be, and not anything about you personally.

Red — Severe
Two or more independent Tier A sources, this drug in the cohort, the nutrient directly measured, consistent direction, clinically meaningful magnitude, a named mechanism, no substantial contradicting Tier A evidence.
Orange — Moderate
At least one Tier A source with this drug in the cohort showing a real but bounded deficit: an exposure window, a subgroup, low frequency, or a functional rather than circulating deficit.
Yellow — Low
Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction.
Not graded — disclosed evidence gap
Nothing has been measured here, so this finding cannot be graded. That does not establish either safety or harm, and it is not the same as a White result.Source definition: Not gradeable under the rules above because nothing has been measured. Published as a documented gap, never as reassurance that there is no effect.

What the research found

Sodium: fluid retention and reduced diuretic natriuresis (direction: retention, not depletion)

Yellow — Low

See study details

The label warns of fluid retention, edema and hypertension and says etodolac can reduce the natriuretic effect of furosemide and thiazides in some patients; no etodolac study measuring serum or urinary sodium was retrieved. This is a water and sodium handling effect, not a dietary sodium deficiency.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: None measured for etodolac. The label lists the diuretic interaction as occurring in some patients, not all.
  • At-risk subgroups: Heart failure, volume depletion, elderly patients, and people on loop or thiazide diuretics, ACE inhibitors or lithium [1].

Regulatory status

Label sec 5.4 and 5.5: NSAIDs can cause new or worsening hypertension, and fluid retention and edema have been observed in some patients (heart failure hospitalization about two-fold increased in an NSAID meta-analysis cited by the label). Sec 7: etodolac can reduce the natriuretic effect of furosemide and thiazides in some patients; NSAIDs raise plasma lithium and reduce renal lithium clearance. Edema is listed below 1% under metabolic and nutritional reactions [1] (label via summarizing fetch).

Population evidence

No etodolac-specific measurement of serum sodium, urinary sodium excretion or hyponatremia was retrieved. A web search for etodolac with hyponatremia or SIADH returned only titles, none of which concerned etodolac (the one SIADH case titled in the results involved ketorolac and was not opened); a PubMed listing for etodolac and hyponatremia was rate-limited (HTTP 429) and could not be read.

Mechanism

Present at class and label level: antiprostaglandin renal effects, with the label noting elderly patients may be more sensitive to the antiprostaglandin effects [1]. An etodolac-specific demonstration in humans was not located.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence Edema incidence is below 1% in the label list [1], and no hyponatremia report for etodolac was found in the channels that opened. Framing caution Retention or dilution risk, not a sodium deficiency. This entry must never be read as advice to raise sodium intake or take sodium supplements; any salt or fluid change belongs to the prescriber.

Potassium: retention risk (direction: excess), renal mechanism with an etodolac-specific null in a large cohort

Yellow — Low

See study details

The label describes NSAID renal injury and lists elevated BUN, creatinine rise and renal insufficiency, which is the route to potassium retention, but the one large cohort that named etodolac found no significant hyperkalemia association, and the sections of the label retrieved contain no hyperkalemia statement.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: Etodolac-specific null in [9] (summary level). A PubMed listing for etodolac and hyperkalemia returned only this record (listing text).
  • At-risk subgroups: Chronic kidney disease, heart failure, dehydration, concurrent ACE inhibitor, ARB or potassium-sparing diuretic use, and older age [1].

Regulatory status

Label sec 5.6 describes renal papillary necrosis and other renal injury with long-term NSAID use and names heart failure, impaired renal or hepatic function, diuretic or ACE inhibitor use and age as high-risk. The retrieved summaries found no hyperkalemia or potassium text in the label [1]; this is a statement about what the summarizing fetch returned, not proof the full text lacks it. Adverse reactions below 1% include elevated BUN, increased serum creatinine, renal insufficiency, renal failure and papillary necrosis [1].

Population evidence

Lafrance and Miller 2012 [9]: nested case-control with 18,326 moderate-to-severe hyperkalemia cases; per the PubMed listing summary retrieved, rofecoxib, celecoxib, diclofenac and indomethacin were associated with elevated risk, whereas etodolac and several other NSAIDs showed no significant association. Individual odds ratios and the full abstract were not read (OpenAlex held no abstract; the PubMed record page returned a bot-verification screen). Etodolac is in this cohort.

Mechanism

Present at class level through reduced renal prostaglandin support of renal function [1]. No etodolac-specific potassium excretion study was retrieved.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence The only etodolac-specific cohort result is null, so this entry is a context flag and not a signal. Framing caution Retention is the theoretical risk. Potassium supplements and potassium salt substitutes would be the hazard in at-risk people, not the remedy. No potassium dose is recommended here.

Folate: NSAID class extrapolation from in vitro enzyme inhibition, etodolac not in the cohort, one uncited consumer claim

Yellow — Low

See study details

Several NSAIDs inhibit folate-dependent enzymes in vitro, but etodolac was not in the tested set of the study retrieved, no folate or homocysteine measurement in etodolac users was found, and the only etodolac-specific claim is an uncited consumer listing.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: No folate, homocysteine or red-cell folate study in etodolac users was retrieved. A web search with etodolac and folate returned only titles (Baggott 1992, the 2020 structural paper and unrelated pages), none an etodolac folate study.

Regulatory status

No folate statement in the label sections retrieved. Sec 7: NSAIDs have been reported to competitively inhibit methotrexate accumulation and could enhance methotrexate toxicity [1]. That is a drug-drug toxicity interaction (Hard Rule 4), not folate depletion by etodolac.

Population evidence

CLASS EXTRAPOLATION. Baggott 1992 [13] (Tier C, in vitro plus a small clinical correlation): sulphasalazine, sulindac, indomethacin, naproxen and ibuprofen competitively inhibited folate-dependent transformylase and dihydrofolate reductase, aspirin and acetaminophen were weak, and the abstract states that an aromatic ring with a side chain carrying a carboxylic acid is required; antifolate activity correlated with reduced one-carbon biosynthesis in blood cells from arthritis patients. Etodolac was NOT in the tested set, so it was not in the cohort; whether etodolac fits the stated structure rule was not evaluated. A 2020 structural paper [14] on NSAID inhibition of human dihydrofolate reductase was read only as an excerpt that named diflunisal; etodolac was not mentioned in that excerpt. The NIH Office of Dietary Supplements folate fact sheet lists only methotrexate, antiepileptic drugs and sulfasalazine under medication interactions and names no NSAID [15]. A B-PROOF analysis of medication use and homocysteine in 2,912 adults aged 65 or older [21] reported on diuretics, antihypertensives, beta-blockers and metformin and did not report NSAIDs, so it neither supports nor refutes this entry.

Circulating claim

People's Pharmacy, article dated 2024-06-11 [19], lists NSAIDs "ie diclofenac, etodolac, ibuprofen, indomethacin, naproxen, oxaprozin, piroxicam, sulindac" under medicines that deplete folic acid, with no citation (Tier D). A pharmacist blog [20] claims NSAIDs deplete folate and raise homocysteine, names ibuprofen, naproxen, indomethacin and celecoxib but not etodolac, and cites no NSAID study. Neither supports a grade. Because a class member has real in vitro data, the claim is graded yellow rather than white.

Mechanism

Present for class members in vitro [13]; not demonstrated for etodolac.

Class cohort test

Fails for direct support: etodolac was not studied in [13], so the source is Tier C and capped at yellow.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence In vitro inhibition constants were not compared with tissue etodolac concentrations (the label reports more than 99% plasma protein binding [1]), and the national reference source on folate interactions does not list NSAIDs [15]. Framing caution Theoretical class signal only. Not a folate deficiency claim for etodolac and no folic acid supplementation is recommended. For people also taking methotrexate, the interaction is a prescriber matter.

Zinc: no etodolac zinc evidence retrieved

Not graded — disclosed evidence gap

See study details

No label statement, study or consumer claim linking etodolac to zinc status or zinc binding was found.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Nothing has been measured here, so this finding cannot be graded. That does not establish either safety or harm, and it is not the same as a White result. Ungraded

Limits on what this shows

  • Why no grade: Dual condition met: no Tier B or C evidence located, and no circulating claim for etodolac and zinc was found. Tooling-limited in part (the zinc-specific PubMed listing was blocked); the null label and the empty Crossref result favor a genuine gap, but this is not a finding of safety.

Channels tried

Label read (no zinc statement) [1]. PubMed listing "etodolac iron" (opened; only the copper and iron assay papers). Crossref bibliographic query "etodolac zinc" (opened: 8 items, all pharmacopeial monographs or drug reference entries, no study). PubMed listing "etodolac zinc" returned HTTP 429 (not read). Web search for etodolac with copper or zinc complexes returned titles that did not concern etodolac. Consumer pages opened (drugs.com food and alcohol interactions and patient pages [22]) list no zinc or mineral interaction apart from antacids reducing absorption.

Repair attempt 2026-10-07

A second pass was made after the first review. WebSearch for etodolac with serum zinc, zinc complexes and zinc levels was refused (shared per-turn search budget exhausted, no results returned). The PubMed listing "etodolac zinc" was refused again with HTTP 429 after a wait of several minutes, and the Europe PMC REST query combining etodolac with oxidative stress or zinc was refused with HTTP 429; the fetch tool asked that refused pages not be refetched. No new source was opened, so nothing could be graded and no source was added. Whether a zinc complexation assay paper (analogous to the copper and iron paper [17]) exists for etodolac remains unchecked; if one is found it would be Tier B and would move this entry to yellow.

Gap type

Mixed: label and Crossref empty (genuine), PubMed listing blocked (tooling-limited).

The five body-system areas

Each finding is counted once, in a single area. Where a study is mentioned in a second area it is context only.

Mitochondrial Burden

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Mitochondrial burden: CLASS EXTRAPOLATION from NSAID uncoupling studies that did not include etodolac, plus one in vitro panel that tested etodolac without a reported effect

Yellow — Low

See study details

No study of etodolac effects on mitochondrial respiration or membrane potential was found; related NSAIDs uncouple oxidative phosphorylation in vitro, and a 2012 mouse mitochondrial enzyme panel tested etodolac but its abstract names other NSAIDs as the inhibitors.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null and reverse findings: Kasuya 2012 did not name etodolac among inhibitors [10]. A PubMed listing for etodolac with mitochondria returned only that record. No human mitochondrial function or toxicity signal for etodolac was located.

Regulatory status

No mitochondrial statement in the label sections retrieved [1].

Population evidence

None in humans. CLASS EXTRAPOLATION: Moreno-Sanchez 1999 [11] (Tier C for etodolac): the abstract text retrieved states diclofenac, piroxicam, indomethacin, naproxen, nabumetone, nimesulide and meloxicam were tested on mitochondrial respiration, ATP synthesis and membrane potential, with nimesulide, meloxicam, piroxicam and indomethacin acting as uncouplers and nabumetone inhibiting respiratory chain site 1 (via a PubMed listing summary; full text not opened). Etodolac was NOT in the cohort. Nadanaciva 2013 [12], a panel of NSAIDs in isolated mitochondria, hepatocytes and zebrafish, was seen only as OpenAlex metadata (no abstract); its keyword list did not include etodolac, so it is not used. Kasuya 2012 [10] (Tier B, in vitro): eleven NSAIDs including etodolac were tested on acyl-CoA synthetase activity in mouse liver and brain mitochondria; the abstract names diflunisal and mefenamic acid (and aspirin for octanoic acid) as inhibitors and gives no etodolac result, so an etodolac effect or null cannot be read from it (abstract reconstructed via OpenAlex; full text not opened).

Mechanism

Named for class members (protonophore-like uncoupling [11]); not shown for etodolac. Etodolac is a carboxylic acid NSAID of the pyranocarboxylic class [6] and more than 99% albumin bound [1], so free exposure is low, but whether concentrations in people reach uncoupling levels is not established.

Class cohort test

Etodolac absent from [11] and unconfirmed in [12], so the class evidence is Tier C and capped at yellow.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence Isolated-mitochondria screens do not show clinical mitochondrial toxicity, and the one etodolac-inclusive panel did not single etodolac out. Framing caution Mechanistic plausibility only. This entry does not support any mitochondrial or antioxidant supplement and is not a deficiency claim.

Oxidative Stress

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Oxidative stress: no etodolac redox measurement retrieved

Not graded — disclosed evidence gap

See study details

No study measuring an oxidative-stress marker or antioxidant enzyme with etodolac was retrieved, and no consumer claim about etodolac and oxidative stress was found.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Nothing has been measured here, so this finding cannot be graded. That does not establish either safety or harm, and it is not the same as a White result. Ungraded

Limits on what this shows

  • Why no grade: Dual condition met: no Tier B or C source with an oxidative-stress endpoint was opened for etodolac or for the NSAID class in a cohort that includes it, and no circulating claim about etodolac and oxidative stress was found to rebut. This is partly tooling-limited: class-level NSAID redox literature likely exists and could not be retrieved because Crossref and PubMed listing queries were rate-limited and the WebSearch budget was exhausted. Not a finding of safety.

Channels tried

PubMed listing "etodolac oxidative stress" (opened, 7 records): a photo-oxidative degradation paper for the molecule in water, an etodolac plus alpha-tocopherol rodent Alzheimer model (listing text only, not opened), a synthetic etodolac hydrazone derivative study of sperm and testis lipid peroxidation (a different compound), an etodolac plus N-acetylcysteine obesity cardiomyopathy rat study that I opened through OpenAlex (abstract reports cardiac function and liver fibrosis and no oxidative marker) [18], and cancer cell and angiogenesis papers. Web search for etodolac with malondialdehyde, glutathione and antioxidant enzymes returned titles only, none an etodolac study I could confirm; the two RA papers it surfaced did not involve etodolac [23]. A Crossref query for class-level NSAID redox studies returned HTTP 429. Label read: no oxidative-stress statement [1].

Context, not evidence for the drug

Active rheumatoid arthritis itself is associated with higher serum malondialdehyde and lower vitamin E, beta-carotene and glutathione reductase activity [23] (no etodolac involvement), so any redox change in treated arthritis patients is confounded by indication (Hard Rule 6).

Repair attempt 2026-10-07

A second pass was made after the first review. WebSearch for etodolac with malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase was refused (shared per-turn search budget exhausted, no results returned). Fetch-tool queries were refused with HTTP 429 and a request not to refetch: PubMed listing "etodolac antioxidant lipid peroxidation", an OpenAlex works search "etodolac oxidative stress", a Crossref bibliographic query for etodolac with oxidative stress and antioxidant, and a Europe PMC REST query combining etodolac with oxidative stress or zinc. Retries were spaced about 1.5, 4 and 5 minutes apart (one attempt per interval, none repeated against the same refused URL except the PubMed zinc listing, once) and were all refused. No new source was opened, so nothing could be graded and no source was added.

Gap type

Tooling-limited for class-level evidence; likely genuine gap for etodolac-specific evidence.

Copper and Iron Balance

Copper and iron are assessed separately. Nothing here is counted twice.

Iron: GI blood loss pathway (drug toxicity, direction: loss), no iron status measured in etodolac users

Yellow — Low

See study details

Etodolac carries the NSAID class warnings for GI bleeding and anemia, but controlled 51-chromium fecal blood loss with etodolac was low and close to placebo in healthy volunteers, a veterans cohort found fewer clinically significant upper GI events than with naproxen, and no study measured ferritin, transferrin saturation or other iron indices in etodolac users.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: The blood loss data above are near placebo and are short-exposure studies in mostly young healthy volunteers [4][5], so they do not test older arthritis patients on years of therapy. The SOS meta-analysis abstract [24] gave no etodolac estimate and is not relied on. The 0.39 odds ratio compares etodolac with naproxen (an active comparator) and says nothing about etodolac versus non-use.
  • At-risk subgroups: Aspirin co-users (9-fold higher event rate with etodolac in [7]; label says concomitant aspirin is not generally recommended), warfarin users (label: GI bleeding effects are synergistic), prior ulcer history and older adults [1][7].

Regulatory status

Label sec 5.2 warns of GI inflammation, bleeding, ulceration and perforation (upper GI ulcers or bleeding in about 1% at 3 to 6 months and 2 to 4% at one year; prior ulcer history raises risk more than 10-fold). Sec 5.12 states anemia is sometimes seen with NSAIDs and may be due to fluid retention, occult or gross GI blood loss, or an incompletely described effect on erythropoiesis. Anemia, melena and GI bleeding appear in the adverse reaction lists below 1%. Iron is not mentioned [1]. Label text was read through a summarizing fetch tool, not as raw text.

Population evidence

Lanza 1989 [5]: four microbleeding studies in healthy subjects plus a 4-week arthritis patient study, 51-chromium red-cell labeling, etodolac 600 to 1,200 mg/day; per the retrieved page the greatest mean daily increase in blood loss with etodolac was 0.2 mL, versus 4 to 5 mL/day increases with aspirin and larger increases with naproxen, ibuprofen and indomethacin, and endoscopy scores after one week were similar to baseline and placebo (page read via summarizing fetch; full text not opened). Moore 2008 [4]: systematic review of 47 trials (1,162 individuals, mostly healthy young men); etodolac sat in a lower-loss group with diclofenac and meloxicam at about 0.5 to 0.9 mL/day, versus 2.0 mL/day for ibuprofen and naproxen; no etodolac-only trial count or dose was reported in the text read. Weideman 2004 [7]: historical cohort at the Dallas VA, 16,286 veterans (5,596 patient-years); clinically significant upper GI event incidence 0.24% for etodolac versus 0.78% for naproxen (odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.76), and concurrent low-dose aspirin raised event rates about 9-fold with etodolac (abstract as retrieved from a university repository page). Zvaifler 1989 [6]: narrative review stating etodolac microbleeding was comparable to placebo. None of these measured iron, ferritin or hemoglobin.

Mechanism

Present at class level: label sec 12.1 states the mechanism may be related to prostaglandin synthetase inhibition [1], and NSAID mucosal injury can bleed. Etodolac also forms an iron(III) complex in an analytical assay [17], with no physiological meaning shown (see Overlap map).

Hard Rule 2 and 6 checks

GI bleeding and anemia are clinical outcomes, not iron deficiency. Iron deficiency needs measured iron indices. Confounding by indication is presumed: rheumatoid disease and osteoarthritis populations, aspirin co-use and chronic inflammation all affect bleeding and hemoglobin independent of the drug.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence and confounding Low fecal blood loss and the lower event rate than naproxen weaken any claim that etodolac is an important iron-loss drug; the veterans cohort is mostly men and aspirin co-use dominated risk. Framing caution This is a toxicity pathway (blood loss), not an intake or absorption deficiency. New iron deficiency or black stools on etodolac calls for evaluating the bleeding source and the prescription, not an iron supplement by default. No iron dose is recommended here.

Copper: in vitro complexation in an analytical assay only, no copper measurement in people or animals given etodolac

Yellow — Low

See study details

Etodolac forms a copper(II) complex in the test tube, used to assay the drug, but no study measured copper status, ceruloplasmin or copper absorption with etodolac.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: No copper measurement for etodolac users was found, in either direction. The PubMed listing for etodolac with iron returned this paper and one related assay paper (PMID 18410679, iron(III) oxidation spectrophotometry, listing text only).

Regulatory status

No copper statement in the label sections retrieved [1].

Population evidence

None in humans or animals. Amer 2005 [17] (Tier B, in vitro analytical chemistry): etodolac formed colored complexes with copper(II) acetate (1:2 metal to drug) and iron(III) chloride (1:3), extracted and measured spectrophotometrically at 684 nm and 385 nm for pharmaceutical assay (abstract reconstructed via OpenAlex; full text not opened).

Mechanism

Metal binding by etodolac under assay conditions is demonstrated; physiological relevance (plasma concentration, competition from albumin and ceruloplasmin, effect on absorption or excretion) is not shown.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence Metal complexation in a flask for analysis does not show depletion. Framing caution Chemical curiosity only. Not a copper deficiency or excess claim and not a reason to supplement or restrict copper. Graded separately from Iron (Hard Rule 7).

Gut Microbiome Risk

Each finding below is counted once, in this area only.

Gut microbiome risk: CLASS EXTRAPOLATION from a non-antibiotic drug review that does not name etodolac

Yellow — Low

See study details

A systematic review links NSAIDs as a group to expansion of Gammaproteobacteria and Enterococcaceae with inconsistent alpha diversity findings, but its abstract names no NSAID, and no etodolac microbiome study was found.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: No etodolac-specific microbiome study was retrieved. A PubMed listing for etodolac and microbiota was rate-limited (HTTP 429, twice) and not read; a web search for etodolac with gut microbiota, microbiome or dysbiosis returned only titles, none an etodolac study (one ketorolac rat study title was not opened).

Regulatory status

No microbiome statement in the label sections retrieved [1]. Dyspepsia (10%), abdominal pain, diarrhea, flatulence and nausea are the common GI reactions [1] and are not microbiome findings.

Population evidence

CLASS EXTRAPOLATION, Tier C: Le Bastard 2017 [16], systematic review of molecular microbiome studies of proton pump inhibitors, metformin, NSAIDs, opioids, statins and antipsychotics; NSAIDs gave inconsistent alpha diversity results, were the only class that did not significantly alter beta diversity, and, with PPIs, metformin and opioids, were associated with increased Gammaproteobacteria and Enterococcaceae (abstract reconstructed via OpenAlex). The abstract does not name the NSAIDs, so whether etodolac was in any underlying cohort is unconfirmed.

Mechanism

Plausible in principle through NSAID mucosal injury (label sec 5.2 [1]); not demonstrated for etodolac. Etodolac showed low fecal blood loss and endoscopic scores near placebo in short studies [5], which does not support a strong mucosal-injury route.

Class cohort test

Etodolac inclusion could not be confirmed, so the class result is Tier C and capped at yellow.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence The class review found beta diversity was not significantly altered by NSAIDs, and the underlying studies are heterogeneous. Framing caution Not a dysbiosis claim for etodolac. No probiotic or other supplement is implied.

Oxygen and ATP Output

Oxygen delivery and ATP production are assessed separately. Nothing here is counted twice.

Oxygen delivery/utilization: labeled hemolytic anemia and one immune hemolysis case report, an outcome pathway and not a nutrient deficiency

Yellow — Low

See study details

Hemolytic anemia is listed as a rare probable-causal event on the etodolac label, and a published case describes severe Coombs-positive hemolytic anemia from antibodies to an etodolac glucuronide metabolite; no study measured hemoglobin, red-cell mass or tissue oxygen delivery in etodolac users against a control group.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: None for hemolysis. A PubMed listing for etodolac with erythrocytes, methemoglobin or hemoglobin was rate-limited (HTTP 429) and not read, so the absence of other hemolysis or methemoglobin reports is tooling-limited.

Regulatory status

Label sec 5.12 (anemia causes: fluid retention, occult or gross GI blood loss, incompletely described effect on erythropoiesis) and platelet inhibition with prolonged bleeding time. Hemic and lymphatic reactions below 1%: ecchymosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, bleeding time increased, agranulocytosis; the probable-causal list also names hemolytic anemia, aplastic anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia and pancytopenia [1].

Population evidence

Cunha 2000 [8] (Tier B, case report): a patient developed severe Coombs-positive hemolytic anemia after taking etodolac on two separate occasions; the serum reacted only weakly with normal red cells but strongly with red cells exposed to an active urinary etodolac glucuronide, and the authors concluded sensitivity was to the glucuronide rather than the parent drug (abstract reconstructed via OpenAlex; full text not opened). No controlled hemoglobin, hematocrit or arterial oxygenation study in etodolac users was retrieved.

Mechanism

Immune, drug-dependent antibody to a metabolite (glucuronide) on red cells [8]. The GI blood loss and fluid retention routes named in the label are covered in the Iron and Sodium entries and are not counted again here.

Hard Rule 2 check

Hemolytic anemia from an idiosyncratic immune reaction is a drug adverse event. It is not an oxygen-delivery nutrient deficiency and not iron deficiency, and it implies no supplement.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence and confounding One case report and a below 1% label frequency; chronic inflammatory disease itself lowers hemoglobin, and older arthritis patients carry other bleeding risks. Framing caution A monitoring prompt (blood count), not a deficiency claim. New unexplained anemia on etodolac belongs with the prescriber. No supplement is implied.

ATP production: CLASS EXTRAPOLATION, same source as Mitochondrial burden, no etodolac energy-output measurement

Yellow — Low

See study details

The only evidence on cellular energy output is the class-level NSAID work in which ATP synthesis was an endpoint for other NSAIDs; no study measured ATP or energy status in etodolac-treated cells, tissues or people.

Full detail and limits

What the grade means here: Mechanistic plausibility only (Tier B), or class extrapolation (Tier C) with no drug-specific human status data; also used for context flags and interactions running the other direction. Yellow

Limits on what this shows

  • Null findings: None found that measured ATP or energy status with etodolac. No human fatigue, lactate or energy-status data were located.

Regulatory status

No ATP or energy-metabolism statement in the label sections retrieved [1].

Population evidence

None in humans. CLASS EXTRAPOLATION: Moreno-Sanchez 1999 [11]: ATP synthesis was one of three endpoints for seven NSAIDs that did not include etodolac (magnitudes and concentrations not read). A PubMed listing for etodolac with ATP returned four records that concern ATP release as a signaling molecule or cancer cell studies (listing text only, not opened), not cellular ATP production by etodolac.

Mechanism

Uncoupling lowers the proton gradient that drives ATP synthase in isolated preparations [11]; not shown for etodolac, and intact-cell ATP was not measured for it.

Class cohort test

Etodolac was not in the cohort of [11]; Tier C, capped at yellow.

Counter-evidence held on record

Counter-evidence Cells compensate for modest uncoupling, and the evidence is not independent of the Mitochondrial burden entry (see Overlap map). Framing caution Do not translate this into a fatigue or low-energy claim for etodolac users. No supplement is implied.

Claims checked and not supported

These circulate online for this medication. They are listed here only so they can be answered, never as findings, and they are not graded.

A claim with no supporting evidence is not necessarily disproven. Where evidence actually argues against a claim, that is stated below.

  • No white (fully unsupported) claim located for etodolac

    Where it comes from: Consumer pages opened: Drugs.com etodolac pages [22] (no depletion statement; antacid and alcohol notes only) and the Antidote Research etodolac page (HTTP 404, not available).

    Why it fails: Nothing to rebut at white level. The only etodolac-specific depletion claim found (folic acid, People's Pharmacy [19]) has class-level in vitro support and is therefore graded yellow in the Folate entry with its lack of citation stated, not listed here as white.

How the body handles this medication

Metabolism and enzymes
Extensively metabolized in the liver; 6-, 7- and 8-hydroxylated metabolites and etodolac glucuronide were identified. The label states the role, if any, of a specific cytochrome P450 system is unknown; no CYP induction or inhibition statement was found. Racemic drug: the S enantiomer is active, with no R to S conversion in vivo.[1] DailyMed label sec 12.3 (read via summarizing fetch)
Elimination
About 1% of a dose is excreted unchanged in urine; 72% of the dose is recovered in urine as parent drug plus metabolites, with glucuronidated metabolites also partly eliminated in feces. Half-life about 6.4 hours.[1] sec 12.3
Absorption, food and antacids
Peak plasma concentration at about 80 minutes (plus or minus 30). Food reduces the peak by about one-half. Antacids can decrease the peak by 15 to 20%. No named absorption transporter appeared in the sections retrieved.[1] sec 12.3, 7
Protein binding and hepatic or renal impairment
More than 99% bound to plasma proteins, mainly albumin. Disposition of total and free drug was not altered in compensated cirrhosis; no dose adjustment is generally necessary in mild to moderate renal dysfunction. Age did not change half-life or protein binding.[1] sec 12.3
Renal and electrolyte effects
Label warns of renal papillary necrosis and other renal injury, hypertension, fluid retention and edema. Etodolac can reduce the natriuretic effect of furosemide and thiazides in some patients and raises plasma lithium with reduced renal lithium clearance. In healthy subjects etodolac showed no pharmacokinetic interaction with warfarin, glyburide or phenytoin.[1] sec 5.4 to 5.6, 7; [6] narrative review
Lab test interference and mineral interactions
Urine can give false-positive results for bilirubin and (dipstick) ketones; a small decrease in serum uric acid occurs. No iron, calcium, zinc, copper or other mineral interaction was listed in the sections retrieved apart from the antacid effect.[1] Drug/laboratory test interactions

What the research says is worth watching

General information from the medication label and the studies above. It is not personal medical advice, and any change belongs with your prescriber.

  • Lab / label

    Hemoglobin, hematocrit, ferritin

    The label says anemia is sometimes seen with NSAIDs and lists anemia and hemolytic anemia among rare reactions [1]. If anemia is found, ferritin and transferrin saturation distinguish iron deficiency from other causes, because anemia alone does not show iron deficiency. New iron deficiency in an adult warrants evaluation for GI blood loss rather than assumption of a drug cause.

  • Symptoms

    GI bleeding signs

    Black or tarry stool, bloody stool, vomit that looks like coffee grounds and epigastric pain should be reported promptly [1][22]. Highest concern with aspirin co-use (event rate about 9-fold higher with etodolac in one cohort [7]), warfarin, prior ulcer or older age.

  • Lab / renal

    Creatinine, potassium, blood pressure, edema

    Worth checking kidney function and potassium when etodolac is combined with an ACE inhibitor, ARB, diuretic or lithium, or in chronic kidney disease, heart failure or dehydration [1]. The etodolac-specific hyperkalemia cohort result was null [9]; retention is the theoretical risk and potassium supplements or salt substitutes would be the hazard. Track blood pressure, weight gain and swelling [1]. This is a water-handling signal and not a reason to add salt.

  • Hematologic

    Unexplained anemia or jaundice

    Immune hemolytic anemia has been reported after repeat exposure and was Coombs positive [8]. New unexplained anemia on etodolac, especially after re-starting, belongs with the prescriber.

  • Timing

    Antacids, food and supplement separation

    Antacids can lower the peak concentration by 15 to 20% and food by about one-half [1]; the label text retrieved gave no separation interval, so timing is a pharmacist matter. No vitamin or mineral supplement interaction is listed. No supplement dose is recommended or appears anywhere in this dossier, so no upper-limit comparison was needed.

  • Drug interactions and lab artifacts

    Methotrexate, lithium, aspirin, warfarin, urine tests

    The label flags added methotrexate toxicity, higher lithium levels, aspirin co-use not generally recommended and synergistic GI bleeding with warfarin [1]. These are drug-drug interactions, not nutrient depletions. Urine bilirubin and ketone dipsticks can read falsely positive, and serum uric acid can fall slightly [1].

  • Special populations

    Pregnancy, renal impairment, older adults, children

    Use at about 20 weeks of gestation or later may cause fetal renal dysfunction and oligohydramnios [1]. No dose adjustment is generally needed in mild to moderate renal dysfunction, and elderly patients may be more sensitive to the antiprostaglandin effects and account for most spontaneous fatal GI reports [1]. Pediatric use was not addressed in the label sections retrieved.

Overlap map, to prevent double counting

  • Iron

    Shares evidence with: Oxygen delivery/utilization; Sodium

    Note: Same label sec 5.12 sentence on anemia causes (blood loss, fluid retention, erythropoiesis) [1]. Any anemia is mediated through the iron (blood loss) and sodium (retention) pathways. The hemolysis case report [8] appears only in the oxygen entry. Treat as one body of label evidence, not several confirmations.

  • Iron

    Shares evidence with: Copper

    Note: Amer 2005 [17] reports both the copper(II) and iron(III) complexes; it is the single source for the Copper entry and a mechanism note in the Iron entry, not an independent line for either. Graded separately per Hard Rule 7.

  • Sodium

    Shares evidence with: Potassium

    Note: Same label sec 5.4 to 5.6 renal prostaglandin framing [1]. The etodolac-specific cohort [9] bears on potassium only; the diuretic natriuresis statement bears on sodium only.

  • Mitochondrial burden

    Shares evidence with: ATP production

    Note: Both rest on the same class paper [11] (etodolac not in cohort) and the same absence of etodolac function data. One body of evidence viewed as two endpoints, not two independent lines (Hard Rule 7 keeps the entries separate, not independent). Kasuya 2012 [10] bears on Mitochondrial burden only.

  • Oxygen delivery/utilization

    Shares evidence with: ATP production; Mitochondrial burden

    Note: No shared source. The hemolysis evidence [1][8] is immune and unrelated to the mitochondrial studies.

  • Folate

    Shares evidence with: No other entry

    Note: The label methotrexate interaction [1] is a drug-drug toxicity interaction and is recorded in the Folate entry only. The same uncited consumer list [19] is the only circulating claim.

  • Gut microbiome risk

    Shares evidence with: Iron

    Note: No shared source. GI blood loss and endoscopy data [5] are cited in both entries for different statements (blood loss in Iron; low mucosal injury as context in Microbiome).

  • Oxidative stress; Zinc

    Shares evidence with: No other entry

    Note: Ungraded; no evidence to overlap.

All references used above
  1. Etodolac tablets and capsules, prescribing information (DailyMed, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, setid ec82b108-6a6f-4d1b-82cb-831d4ed36c80). — Regulatory label (Tier A); the retrieved page showed a revision of October 2024. Sections 5.2, 5.4 to 5.6, 5.12, 7, 8.1, 8.5, 12.1, 12.3, adverse reactions and laboratory test interactions read through a summarizing fetch tool across four passes, not as raw text. Two summaries stated the label contains no hyperkalemia text and no COX-2 selectivity statement; that is what the summarizer returned and not proof of absence.
  2. WHO Collaborating Centre, ATC/DDD Index: etodolac, M01AB08 (acetic acid derivatives and related substances), DDD 0.4 g oral. — Reference index, opened via summarizing fetch.
  3. Wikipedia. Etodolac. — Tier D for evidence purposes. Used only for brand names, the ATC code and the statement that etodolac is preferentially COX-2 selective (the page gives a 179-fold figure that was not verified against a primary source here); opened through a summarizing fetch. The label itself states no selectivity.
  4. Moore RA, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Faecal blood loss with aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors: systematic review of randomized trials using autologous 51-chromium labelled erythrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther 2008. — Systematic review, 47 trials, 1,162 individuals, mostly healthy young men. DOI 10.1186/ar2355. Etodolac appears once in the results text as part of a grouped statement (diclofenac, meloxicam and etodolac about 0.5 to 0.9 mL/day); no etodolac-only table values were read. Opened via summarizing fetch of the BioMed Central page.Cohort test passed only at group level: etodolac is named, but not separately stratified.
  5. Lanza FL, Arnold JD, et al. Etodolac, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug: gastrointestinal microbleeding and endoscopic studies. Clin Rheumatol 1989;8(Suppl 1):5-15. — Four microbleeding studies in healthy subjects and a 4-week arthritis patient study. DOI 10.1007/bf02214105. OpenAlex held no abstract; the findings were read from the Springer page through a summarizing fetch. Full text not opened.
  6. Zvaifler N. A review of the antiarthritic efficacy and safety of etodolac. Clin Rheumatol 1989;8(Suppl 1):43-53. — Narrative review (Tier B/C, etodolac-specific); used only for the pyranocarboxylic class label, the microbleeding statement and the no-interaction finding with warfarin, glyburide and phenytoin. Read via summarizing fetch of the Springer page; DOI 10.1007/BF02214109.
  7. Weideman RA, Kelly KC, Kazi S, Cung A, Roberts KT, Smith BR, Sarosi GA, Little BB, Cryer B. Risks of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal events with etodolac and naproxen: a historical cohort analysis. Gastroenterology 2004. — Historical cohort, Dallas VA, 16,286 veterans. Abstract read from a university repository page through summarizing fetch; full text not opened.
  8. Cunha PS, Lord RS, Johnson ST, Wilker PR, Aster RC, Bougie DW. Immune hemolytic anemia caused by sensitivity to a metabolite of etodolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Transfusion 2000. — Case report (Tier B). PMID 10864985. DOI 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40060663.x. Abstract reconstructed through OpenAlex (summarizing fetch); full text not opened. The PubMed record page returned HTTP 429.
  9. Lafrance JP, Miller DR. Dispensed selective and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of moderate to severe hyperkalemia: a nested case-control study. Am J Kidney Dis 2012. — Nested case-control, 18,326 cases. PMID 22503390. DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.328. Only a PubMed listing summary (via summarizing fetch) was read; OpenAlex had no abstract, the PubMed record page was bot-verification blocked and the publisher link returned no content. Odds ratios not read.Abstract-level, summary-only read; no odds ratios. Etodolac named in the cohort summary.
  10. Kasuya F, Kazuhiro M, Hasegawa T, Nakamoto K, Tokuyama S, Masuyama T. Effect of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the acyl-CoA synthetase activity toward medium-chain, long-chain and polyunsaturated fatty acids in mitochondria of mouse liver and brain. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2012. — In vitro (Tier B). PMID 22299587. DOI 10.3109/14756366.2011.636742. Abstract reconstructed via OpenAlex; full text not opened. Etodolac was tested but no etodolac result appears in the abstract.
  11. Moreno-Sanchez R, Bravo C, Vasquez C, Ayala G, Silveira LH, Martinez-Lavin M. Inhibition and uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: study in mitochondria, submitochondrial particles, cells, and whole heart. Biochem Pharmacol 1999;57(7):743-752. — In vitro. PMID 10075080. Abstract text via a PubMed listing page and OpenAlex metadata, summarizing fetch; full text not opened.Cohort test failed: tested NSAIDs were diclofenac, piroxicam, indomethacin, naproxen, nabumetone, nimesulide and meloxicam. Etodolac not in the cohort; Tier C class extrapolation only.
  12. Nadanaciva S, Aleo MD, Strock CJ, Stedman DB, Wang H, Will Y. Toxicity assessments of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in isolated mitochondria, rat hepatocytes, and zebrafish show good concordance across chemical classes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2013. — DOI 10.1016/j.taap.2013.06.019. OpenAlex returned metadata with no abstract; only keywords and concepts were seen.Cohort test not passed: etodolac not in the keyword list; abstract not read. Not used as evidence.
  13. Baggott JE, Morgan SL, Ha T, Vaughn WH, Hine RJ. Inhibition of folate-dependent enzymes by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Biochem J 1992. — In vitro plus small clinical correlation. PMC1130907. Abstract read via summarizing fetch of the PMC page; full text not opened.Cohort test failed: etodolac not in the tested set. Tier C class extrapolation only.
  14. The structural basis for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug inhibition of human dihydrofolate reductase. J Med Chem 2020. — PMID 32658475. Only an abstract excerpt was returned by the summarizing fetch; the excerpt named diflunisal and did not mention etodolac.Excerpt only; etodolac not mentioned in the excerpt. Not used as evidence.
  15. NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Folate: fact sheet for health professionals. — Reference source (Tier B reference). Medication interactions section names methotrexate, antiepileptic drugs and sulfasalazine; no NSAID. Opened via summarizing fetch.
  16. Le Bastard Q, Al-Ghalith GA, Gregoire M, Chapelet G, Javaudin F, Dailly E, Batard E, Knights D, Montassier E. Systematic review: human gut dysbiosis induced by non-antibiotic prescription medications. Aliment Pharmacol Ther (online 2017). — Systematic review. DOI 10.1111/apt.14451. Abstract reconstructed through OpenAlex (summarizing fetch); full text not opened.Cohort test not passed: abstract names no individual NSAIDs, so etodolac inclusion is unconfirmed. Tier C class extrapolation only.
  17. Amer SM, El-Saharty YS, Metwally FH, Younes KM. Spectrophotometric study of etodolac complexes with copper (II) and iron (III). J AOAC Int 2005. — In vitro analytical chemistry (Tier B). PMID 16526444. DOI 10.1093/jaoac/88.6.1637. Abstract reconstructed via OpenAlex; full text not opened.
  18. Topal AE, Akkoc H, Kelle I, Yilmaz S, Topal D, Akkus M. Impact of N-acetylcysteine and etodolac treatment on systolic and diastolic function in a rat model of myocardial steatosis induced by high-fat-diet. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2014. — Rat study. PMID 25348332. DOI 10.2174/1871530314666141028144702. Abstract via OpenAlex; reports cardiac function and liver fibrosis, no oxidative marker. Not used to support a grade.Not used for any grade; recorded as a channel result.
  19. People's Pharmacy. Are your medicines depriving you of folate? Article dated 2024-06-11. — Consumer health content, Tier D. Names etodolac among NSAIDs listed as depleting folic acid; no citation given. Read via summarizing fetch.Tier D, cited only to record a circulating claim; supports no grade.
  20. Cohen S. NSAIDs raise homocysteine and impair methylation. Pharmacist blog, published 2018-05-19, updated 2024-10-02. — Practitioner blog, Tier D. Claims NSAIDs deplete folate; names ibuprofen, naproxen, indomethacin and celecoxib, not etodolac; the three studies it links (riboflavin and MTHFR, choline, zinc) are not NSAID depletion studies. Read via summarizing fetch.Tier D, circulating claim only; etodolac not named; supports no grade.
  21. Associations between medication use and homocysteine levels in an older population, and potential mediation by vitamin B12 and folate: data from the B-PROOF study. Drugs Aging 2014. — Cross-sectional analysis of a randomized trial baseline, 2,912 adults aged 65 or older. Abstract-level summary read via a university repository page through summarizing fetch.Summary did not report NSAIDs or etodolac; cited only as a limitation.
  22. Drugs.com. Etodolac (patient information page, food and alcohol interactions page, and patient monograph page). — Consumer drug information, Tier D. No nutrient depletion statement; antacid and alcohol cautions and bleeding, anemia, fluid retention and kidney warning signs. Read via summarizing fetch.Tier D; used only for the circulating-claim audit and symptom wording.
  23. Aryaeian N, Djalali M, Shahram F, Jazayeri S, Chamari M, Nazari SA. Beta-carotene, vitamin E, MDA, glutathione reductase and arylesterase activity levels in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Iran J Public Health 2011;40(2):102-109. — Case-control, active rheumatoid arthritis versus controls; no etodolac involvement. Read via a DOAJ record through summarizing fetch. Used only as confounding-by-indication context.Etodolac not in the cohort; context only.
  24. Castellsague J, Riera-Guardia N, Calingaert B, et al. Individual NSAIDs and upper gastrointestinal complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (the SOS project). Drug Saf 2012. — Meta-analysis. PMID 23137151. DOI 10.1007/bf03261999. Abstract reconstructed via OpenAlex; the abstract does not mention etodolac, so it is not relied on.Abstract-only; etodolac value not read; listed so a later revision can extract it.